I completely agree.

I have a few relatives who are total Trump supporters who love this show. The disconnect some of these people have is amazing.

If I had the resources to live independently, I would certainly opt for a very different life for me and my family. I’m certainly not a traditionalist who believes kids absolutely have to be sitting at a desk 5 days a week in order to learn and grow. I’d be thrilled if I could afford to expose my kids to different…

From the non-whites who are “stealing” the jobs they’re too lazy and entitled to do anyway.

I agree. A friend of mine posted the other day “I’m not crazy about Hillary but I’m not crazy. Of COURSE I’m going to vote for her. She’s not even the lesser of two evils. That’s like calling a guy with a bunch of parking tickets the lessor of two evils compared to Ted Bundy.”

Not just men. A friend of mine posted the ad on Facebook yesterday. She apparently has a bunch of Trump-supporting relatives. They went ape-shit on that ad, claiming it was sexist towards men somehow (I can’t even begin to figure out that one well enough to explain the “logic” behind it). When I first saw it, I…

Yeah, I also noticed how off people seemed to be with a logical timeline. They keep naming people who were either way too young, not yet anywhere near A-list, or both, at the time of the rapes. I’m reluctant to speculate who it might be, but I think it’s clear that it’s not most of the names that have surfaced so far.

As someone already mentioned, that’s not what cheating is about. However, I don’t really get why Angelina Jolie is considered to be *that* beautiful, like to the point that people would compare someone as beautiful as Marion Cotillard unfavorably to her. They’re both lovely in their own way. Anyway, neither here nor…

I had no idea Martin Short was an oil exec.

I completely agree. However in this case the article implies that many people in Hollywood knew about the abuse and were afraid to speak up because the rapist is so famous and powerful. So it’s not an instance of a pedophile being so good he goes unnoticed, more that he’s so powerful he can shut everyone up. But…

I agree, but the article implies that a lot of people knew what the rapist was doing and said nothing because he is so famous and powerful. I have a hard time believing that people would be universally singing Tom Hanks’ praises if that were the case. They may keep quiet, but I doubt they’d be monsters enough to talk…

Kiefer Sutherland is too young, not a family man, and wasn’t hugely popular until the late 80s. The rapes started in 1982 if the article is correct.

I’ve heard a few blind items of that nature, but he wasn’t super famous in the early 80s so it’s not Kevin Spacey.

Spacey wasn’t popular in the early 80s when Haim was raped.

I can’t tell which comment you’re replying to for some reason.

I don’t see RDJ being described as a family man. I mean, I know he’s married and has kids but he was more of a Hollywood bad boy. He also wasn’t hugely famous in the early 80s. Whoever the rapist is would have had the power and influence to keep everyone silent about the abuse. He was on SNL in 1985 and did Less Than…

Yes, I agree. Though the article seemed to imply that this was a dirty little secret known throughout Hollywood, but that the rapist was powerful and famous enough to keep it from seeing the light of day. If so many within Hollywood knew what was going on but felt they couldn’t say, I don’t think they would be singing…

Oh, I know. I only mentioned that because the article did. Kiefer Sutherland, Michael J. Fox and Rob Lowe were all too young and/or not really hyper-famous enough in 1982 to have been the person described.

It’s not Tom Hanks.

Kiefer was a kid himself in 1982.