tylerjohn
Darth Squishy
tylerjohn

Most U.S. Media simply does not cover foreign military news at all. The few times I do see an article it is so incorrect I am tearing my hair out.

Soviet Russia, U.S. senate, same difference!

I personally think a Taiwan grab is in the not too distant future. If they can dominate enough of the Global economy, they would be able to handle sanctions pretty well. Any sanctions would probably hurt the state imposing them more than China. And then many regional countries would not want to risk escalating

I pay a lot of attention to Russian media and I thin Russins agree with you totally as well. Russia and China are allies, but not very close, hence Russia has blocked the export of a lot of things to them. I think that Russia may end up in the inconvenient role where it pretty much has to follow along with what China

I've always been ironically perplexed by how hard fire fighting on water is. It seems like it should be easy, but in reality, a fire on a ship seems to be a death sentence for the vessel.

You know he military, acronym first! Then figure out the meaning!

But some varients of the BGM-71 TOW are wireless.

You can tell the beam riding ones (and there are a lot as well) by their weird straight flight path.

Not to mention it helps me distinguish the type of TOW, since the later varients are wireless.

Agreed. I am very against American involve the in foreign conflicts like Iraq, Libya, and Ukraine. I feel that ISIS is a major exception, much of the global community shares partial responsibility for their creation and I feel that it is also our shared responsibility to fix that. And to make sure the global economy

Awesome

What? You do realize that many parts of the FSA split off to JOIN ISIS! I am not sure where you are getting your news, John McCain?

I would be less concerned about falling and more concerned about going deaf

Yah, the PIC needs to be the only one trying to fly

Yes, some more extreme parts of the Iranian government want to launch a first strike, probably the same ones who don’t want to be open to the international community (not everyone in Iran is happy about this). However, the vast majority of Iranian leadership is claiming that it is for defensive reasons. The concept of

Most Iranian sites are underground, which makes a quick in and out air strike very difficult. With Iran disclosing supposedly all of its nuclear information in the new agreement, it will be very hard for the world to look approvingly at a very aggressive nation with a long history of unprovoked attacks and human

Was that according to McCain or Netanyahu?

True. I was specifically referring to air strikes, should have clarified that. A lot of people in Congress and in Israel want an all out war over it, and do not realize what that would do to the global economy.

On the contrary, if Israels enemy also has nukes, there will be MAD, and less conflicts between the two.

Yah, it's like when Both sides of the house and senate agree with Obama, then you know you are fucked.