If a ‘journalist’ can’t be bothered to look through the actual court case and instead just publishes whatever they are told by ChatGPT with no secondary verification, they should not be a journalist. And they should be the target of the libel, not the company that formed the basis of their incredibly thinly-sourced…

This is a pretty good article, and it does a great job pointing out how the insincerity and nonsense in some arguments from the right. However, I can’t help but feel a bit disappointed in the mentions of science and the conclusions that we can draw. The article seems to try to present all biological and hormonal…