An accident?

Details?

Gorgeous car!

Chain should be good for a few hundred thousand miles. However chain tensioners are not uncommon failures and you should change the chain if you’re in there. The only wrenching job that I had to throw in the towel was when a tensioner went bad on an old KA24. I spent 12 hours on it, taking off all accessories, oil…

Mental illness should not be portrayed as something shameful.

My new daily is a diesel pickup, and there’s no thrill in driving it quickly. I notice that I feel much more relaxed when I arrive at my destination

Would you say that limited wiggle room is more the case with 1-3 year old used cars than older, 5+ year old cars? In my experience it seems to be the case. Maybe there is more competition with recent off-lease cars, etc?

I owned not one, but two fox-body Mustangs....with the 2.3 4-banger. The automotive equivalent of stuffing socks down the front of one’s pants.

Good point. And to clarify, I wasn’t implying that it was a bad thing.

That is gorgeous I’d have preferred if they fabricated some pieces under the hood to look a bit more period-correct. The open air filter, etc looks goofy. You are 100% correct on the grille.

You can only legitimately blame him if you buy a hopeless, recently exhumed example....or maybe 5 or 6 of them.

I would say it’s a reality check. A tragic catalyst to admitting that autonomous vehicles still have a long road of testing, and the most important thing is not to be first-to-market.

This is one of the few oddball, loved-by-hipster cars that is in reality a very cool car.

I would recommend keeping your nuts together. Maybe in a sack or something.

Hot! Oh wait....this isn’t COTD.

The under-bed setups are a massive pain in the arse on pickups.

It’s probably a good thing that when I was younger and dumber my mustang only seemed fast.

Yeah, i apparently haven’t performed the ritual correctly

At least you’re not grey like me. Or Maybe it’s rhe TX....