“Long the goldstandard for “huh -what happened?” was The Doris Day Show. In season 1, she was a widow with two kids in rural Mill Valley. Season 2 saw the rural cast ditched as she got a job in San Francisco and commuted, but we only saw her in the city. By Season 4 and 5, she was a sexy swingin’ single (and went…

His mistress and the murderer of his previous wife? Just guessing.

Back in my day you had to pay extra to see that kind of thing, they should be happy.

So...next time they’ll probably do better. Maybe they didn’t realize there was that much gear. Maybe they planned poorly but are willing to learn. Maybe they don’t have a car, in which case a car seat would not be a particularly important purchase.

Don’t be ridiculous. This is pure classism; newsflash, kiddos, raising children isn’t easy, and people who may not have the educational or financial advantages you all have had may struggle at first taking care of kids. Nothing in the post I was responding to was particularly egregious. So they planned poorly; next…

I don’t know why taking the bus precludes them from being able to take care of a baby.

“but dealing with the art director at my old job gave me a taste”

Honestly, if I were an inmate I’d do it for free, too, just to get outside. For the reasons you list, I don’t think the low wages are a big deal. I think a greater injustice is that when they are done with their prison sentence I believe they are precluded from getting paid jobs doing this because of their criminal…

He’s a burnt-out addict who likes to get beat up on the subway. I’m not sure he has anything that can be taken away at this point.

Auerbach was hilariously aggrieved, desperately trying to make the issue whether Buzzfeed accurately paraphrased his response to the emails being released, but not going near the emails themselves.

I doubt Weinstein reads Jezebel, but a reaction might be “she PRETENDED to be asleep? I’ll ruin her!!!”

Oh, I think making judgment is perfectly acceptable on them in this situation.

Lawyers are perfectly entitled to refuse representation. She could have told him no. But like her mother, I suspect she would represent anybody if it got her camera time.

Are you asserting that what they say is false? All of them?

Yeah, it’s stupid. The New York Times doesn’t back down from these kinds of things and won’t be intimidated. And once litigation starts the Times can get discovery on a lot of things, including subpoenaing witnesses for deposition and getting orders to compel them to testify about what happens — which defeats the NDAs.

Based on what I heard from someone who worked for him at one point, he sounds like a terrible person in so many ways.

Good points. Don’t have sex with people under the age of consent is not a hideous, tyrannical rule.

Yep, she buried the lede — the casual mention late in the passage about someone having dropped her baby changed everything for me.

The New York Times’ coverage was driven by their deranged 20+ years of anti-Clinton hatred. We can never let them forget what they did. And not just the Times — specific people at the times. Anytime you’re reading/watching Eric Licthblau, Patrick Healy, Maggie Haberman, Amy Chozick — know that they are hacks who…

I seriously flirted with trying to move to the Caribbean and becoming a shady tax shelter lawyer. I like tropical weather, rum, and it actually sounds like it could be an interesting job.