Under Tinker v. Des Moines, students cannot be banned from wearing clothing because it sends a political message. So yes, he does have the right to wear it.

From a legal standpoint hate speech is excused as a matter of law in this country. It’s not illegal.

That sounds like a lot of work.

“First of all, where in the hell is Sonia Sotomayor ordering takeout from in New York City that it takes 10 to 15 minutes? Recently, I waited over an hour for a salad from Chop’t, located two blocks away from my office.”

“before it’s fit for public consumption because people rely on that data for recreation/agriculture/infrastructure/construction.”

I worked IT at Conde Nast for a couple of months and editorial staff, even junior editorial staff, typically were long gone by 5 pm, and that’s not even counting the 2 hour lunches...

Absolutely not the case; Turkey is a great example of a country where the military has traditionally opposed reactionary politics.

I think they tend to trust their military more than civilian government; historically, the Turkish military has been the institution that’s kept Turkey secular.

Or robbed a meth lab with a sword.

I have mixed feelings about this case, but I do take issue with two arguments made by Anna.

Huh? If that’s aimed at Depp, and his account is true, then what else could it be other than a setup from his point of view? If that’s aimed at the security guards, and their account is true, their first reaction was not “that’s a setup,” their first reaction was to run into the room.

For some reason there seem to be a lot of 20-something hipster women who think it doesn’t matter how skinny and delicate a man is, if he wears a full beard he is “rugged.”

Do you have many bailiffs in your “command”?

Judges have wide discretion over maintaining order in the courtroom, with or without a contempt order. Did he overstep his bounds? Probably, just saying I’ve seen enough incredibly obnoxious lawyers who are just psychologically incapable of self-control that I’m not just assuming it was completely unwarranted.

About a third of the comments are making fun of his appearance. Stay classy, Jezebel.

“And sometimes you need to talk over that judge, if only to demand your rights as a potential defendant.”

Nope, it absolutely can be. I think it’s hard to tell from the story who’s the bad guy here. It is conceivable she was so obnoxious and inappropriate over such a long period of time that the handcuffing is justified.

Same.

Destroying Brazil’s environment was a multicultural process carried out by a plethora of creeds and colors.