3/7 = 0.43

The only problem is that it’s priced above the market. You can buy the same example with the more traditional, and honestly better looking, wheels for about $5K less.

Yeah I can’t believe no one else is commenting that it doesn’t look like a 70 barracuda at all. I’m not sure if Andrew had the wrong car in is head? Clearly it’s more 2nd gen Charger.

Fleekwood

Fleetwoque.

You mean "dynamiq"

I can Celest-iq my own balls!

Oh just be Cadillac - Geriatriq.

Don’t forget “dynamic”

Cadillac can Celest-iq my balls.

I don’t even care, as long as they ditch the alphanumeric garbage.

This naming scheme is particularly idiotiq.

It looks like Dom’s Ice Charger mated with the Mach 40.

I’m seeing more of an AMC Javelin:

Reminds me of the Ford Mach 40. It’s even rear-engined.

This is obviously not a Triton V10, which I’ve deduced in spite of no particular familiarity with the Triton V10 other than googling for a picture of it.

AUTOnomy was a hydrogen fuel cell project, NOT a BEV. GM gave up on BEVs after the EV1 was cancelled, recalled, and crushed. AUTOnomy was introduced after that. GM’s fuel cell tech was also basically abandoned after the bankruptcy because the Obama Administration’s car czar refused to allow them to continue…

The irony here is that GM has had the ability to be the electric car leader for decades now. Ever since the EV1, GM could have pursued the electric car and advanced the technology, their only competition in the late 90's/early 2000's was Toyota for a brief moment.

leave it to GM to be two decades behind itself.

That Batmobile looks much more Jalop than previous iterations. The engine is clearly two in-line fivers mated together.