Think you replied to the wrong guy, buddy

There have been idiots from the dawn of time. Leave millenials out of this.

They went through 99% of the trouble of making a clean, legit-looking, website, and they still had spelling mistakes.

/thread

It died doing what it loved

Yeah its a pretty car but it doesn’t look like looks better than a TVR.

Holy shit they had THAT NSX concept and they chose to go with the other one. Wtf they really don’t know what they’re doing.

Good post. The saddest part is how the bed’s are becoming so tiny. The old ranger was so good because it was a small truck with a usable bed! I don’t want a 4 door truck that has an “open-air” trunk.

I agree with everything except:

Could you explain the reasoning for this design? I’m trying to figure out what (if any) advantage this car has over a typical layout

Sorry that no one got your joke. I did, have a star

The G6 laughs at your Ion’s wanna-be-ugly wing

If it’s anything like the rest of the SRT lineup for the last 15ish years, then no, it’s going to do exactly as advertised for a long time. FCA has never had a problem with under-engineering their performance vehicles.

cool story bro

Behold, the typical hypocrisy of Jalopnik.

Are interiors really such a deal breaker around here? Geez, it looks great to me. How much nicer do you really need it to be? I’d rather have a clean, simple interior.

Jalopnik: “We want fast ridiculous cars!”

People here are fucked. They love working on cars and want manufacturers to make enthusiast cars. But immediately shoot down these badass vehicles because they’re afraid they might have to work on them once in 5 years.

Leave it to Jalopnik to refuse awesome enthusiast cars in favor of a fucking appliance.

“It’s not bad design, it’s good engineering!”