Meh. Not a fan of either website... but I’m a huge fan of the hypocrisy of commenters on both. Like yours :)

Literally quoting:

“Maybe Osuna is a batterer. Maybe he isn’t.” 

The Republicans showed up last year, even though a leftist gunman attacked one of their practices.

Michigan fan who thinks Urban is complete trash and deserves to be fired. Simply arguing that Osuna should receive the same treatment by the same writer.

Diana has written dozens of articles about domestic violence that are right and good and that believe the victim at face value. For some reason, she does not simply believe the victim at face value in the Osuna case. That’s my point here. 

Then why is the case against Osuna flimsy? It’s just about believing victims. I choose to believe both. Diana chooses to only believe one at face value. 

Wait, so for Osuna it’s “maybe he did it, maybe he didn’t” but for Urban it’s“he should be dropped from the team even if only some of what Courtney Smith has said is true.” Good consistency there. Interesting how you find certain flimsy evidence enough to make a judgment, while for other flimsy evidence you have to…