Let me guess because vagina>penks right.

There are studies that show that male students will be marked down by female teachers in spite of turning in the same work as female students. There are also quotas and short list which specifically target only women while nothing similar exist for men, even if men are underrepresented in a situation. Moreover out of…

What if the movie is exclusively on the battlefield.

In other words if a movie about a psrtivuost battlefield and takes place exclusively there, just throw on female soldiers to make people like you feel better.

I’m not sure how this is technically sexist. If women aren’t integral in a movie’s plot does that automatically mean it’s sexist. If a movie is a time period piece about a war, should female soldiers just be thrown in (in spite of it not being historically accurate) just to pass some test a feminist made.

No they weren’t. That was speculation from the desperate article jezeble awhile ago. Although is it really that hard to believe, when have women ever been able to compete well against men physically.

Mixed units were also quite considerably less effective in combat situations which is a huge deal since you know the military is mostly combat oriented.

Those are the physical female elite, but how do compare against their male counterparts. If you’re only argument is that a trained woman could outperform a untrained male then that’s a incredibly weak argument. How do these trained women compete against trained women, how do Olympic lecel female athletes compete…

Not really because men and women are biological groups and laws of averages exist. The average man is taller and heavier then the average woman and athletic men are stronger and faster then athletic women. If you take random groups of men and women off the street and train them to their full physical capabilities, it…

In other words you have no quantifiable verified examples of this strength so you’ll keep spouting it in the event it eventually starts to make sense.

It’s one thing to progress with intellectual exercises but we are talking about physical abilities. Have women in the Olympics made the progress to th point that they are matching up with men and surpassing them. You’re risking lives on a very big “if.”

What happens if the best people just happen to have a penis. If you took the 100 top fastest and strongest people in the world right now they would all be men. I'm not saying to exclude women or anything but what happens when political interest aren't served by results.

Yeah cause sexual dimorphism doesn't exist and clearly women can compete with men physically hence why sports aren't seperated by sex or something. Obviously the instant combat positions are open to women, millions of female recruits will shatter all previous combat records and set new standards.

The problem here is your under the working assumption that female recruits will add strength in some capacity. To date we don't know what strength this is because it certainly isn't in a physical sense.

Do male reporters get to wear hats too.

1000 out of a population of billions.

Still playing that wage gap figure eh.

Is that why women are at least as likely to be abusvie to men in relationships at least according to well researched sources. Is this also why lesbian relationships tend to be amongst the highest of all domestic relationships.

Prior to this movie there have been only 2 prominent female characters, padme and leia. Leia was a authority figure who helped lead the resistance and padme was in politics. Unless you count that blue skinned female Jedi who was shot in revenge of the sith, women have comprised only 2 of the casualties throughout the…

Well given feminist bears don't female bears can rape and that only male bears are capable of doing it then yeah it's a valid complaint.