The Rules Of Time Travel on the show mean when you go to the future, you're explicitly going to a future where you vanished the moment you got in the timestream. I mean, you can be all, "Well, I'll go back to 2016 and change this!" but that won't affect the future until you actually go back and do it. Does that make…

But…..

Unfortunately, the "totally recognizable in geek circles because of supporting role in cult favorite from a decade ago" doesn't really translate into "get more great roles". It more translates into "selling $10 signatures at a media con somewhere in Tennessee and hoping for free drinks at the room party."

So, a friend of mine tells a story that he didn't speak at all until he was four. Not a peep. His family thought there might be something wrong with him. Then one night he was taken to dinner with his grandparents and some other people, and there was another small child named Justin. Justin was a chatterbox. Talk…

I loved how each party idea from the three of them SEEMED like it was going to be horrible, but then turned AMAZING.

To be fair, it's never made clear if he's like, paying her or anything. So that attitude might be because he's getting free work that he has no obligation to use if it's no good.

One of the things I love about the show is how they will often show Liz or Phillip working something without making it clear why or what the end goal is.

The main reason why I can't believe the whole thing was staged is it put their NSA-data tap at risk.

If you're looking for an adaptation of Hound Of The Baskervilles, just watch any episode of Scooby Doo.

Of all the plot points, the one that really bothered me was the idea that NO ONE at Empirical knew the ending to the series, of a book that was coming out THAT DAY. Faux-GRRM talks about the final page like Charles and Diana like they have no idea what's on it. I mean, come on— the book wasn't edited, by Charles or…

Are the Firestorm effects very expensive or something? There's been a couple of times in the past few episodes where "Jax and Stein merge into Firestorm" would solve the problem and yet… they just don't.

What I want is the article explaining the logic of why putting which items in which rooms was a "solution" to get a clue. Because even knowing the Zodiac/Tree of Life/etc. stuff, I can't make heads or tails of it.

Is that the one where you shift into an alternate timeline where you are getting/giving a blowjob RIGHT NOW?

Yeah, I presumed it pretty much was what it looked like.

Zachary Beaver was filmed in my neighborhood at the time, taking over our street and a friend's house, which was the main set. My son was a toddler at the time and obsessed with Stuart Little, so he'd see Lipnicki in the street and shout "GEORGE!"

Except that time he embraced the fire, dated Scorch and then went on a giant Fire God rampage.

"Non" is well-named.

The funny thing is, Samantha's demand makes perfect sense, IF she knew he was the Green Arrow. As "Oliver Queen, reformed playboy", it's completely absurd.

I kind of understand what he's doing. There is, let's say, a societal presumption that Everyone Ought To Be Monogamous in the same sort of way that there was the Everyone Ought To Be Heterosexual until relatively recently. And, on some level, fighting that presumption is a good crusade, to get people in general to…

I don't think you'd see Dan supporting it if the person asking was all, "I need sex twice a day, every day, and my partner seems to tap out at five times a week!"