My count is Clinton 2 or 3 (NAFTA, TPP)

That attitude doesn’t exist on this website. Jezebel has been highly critical of Hillary Clinton on a variety of issues.

“The Clintons”? Oh, don’t do this. “The Clintons” are not running for president, any more than Donald Trump posed nude recumbent on a fur rug for a skeevy men’s magazine.

Hillary Clinton is probably literally the most scrutinized person in the history of planet. From the number of tell-all books written about her to the congressional investigations to the Citizens United videos to the fact that there is an entire non-profit dedicated to just suing her and her husband non-stop. …

Literally no one is pretending this.

Stein is anti-science, or at least comfortable with courting the votes of anti-science voters.

You’re acting like people don’t have legitimate critiques of Stein. Anyone who thinks they are compromising their political ideology if they vote for Hillary Clinton but is fine with voting for Stein, despite her repeated panderings to the pseudo-science folks (most notably anti-vaxxers) is kidding themselves.

Farenthold is already needling Trump’s people with that. I love him.

This is a self-righteous Bernie Bro you’re talking to. Be sure before you ask that you want an answer to your question. Me? I avoid him entirely.

Are you under the impression that Bill and Hillary Clinton are the same person? Or that she might not have her own ideas about medical privacy?

Hmm. Glass being a filthy person would be kind of fun, but my money’s on the condo board being bananas.

I feel like a person whose introduction to porn was their rapist abductor kind of doesn't have the most level starting point for a conversation about the subject. But maybe that's just me.

This is your obligatory reminder that whatever you think of American prudery when it comes to the sex lives of politicians, Anthony Weiner didn’t go down for a little harmless consensual sexting. The “accidental” tweet that broke the story was an unsolicited dick pic sent to a college student who had tweeted him about…

Short version: if you’re a liberal, Johnson holds a couple of stances that you’ll likely agree with, but mostly he’s crazy.

My first choice is Sanders, but my second choice isn’t Clinton, who shares a great many of Sanders’s policy positions, but Johnson, who shares none of Sanders’s policy positions. Because we can’t betray the revolution (which apparently has no substantive policy goals). Also, I like that Sanders and Johnson are both…

I have a seriously hard time believing that you can’t understand what Ira Glass is saying.

LOL, fuck you. :-)

His voice is interesting. I don’t need every single person on the radio to sound the same.

Dumbass, no. Criticizing Clinton’s skill as a public speaker and reinforcing sexist ideas about women’s speaking voices are not mutually exclusive.

Ira Glass’s voice is just fine and it’s ridiculous to complain about people’s natural speaking voices.