Are you shure?

My count is Clinton 2 or 3 (NAFTA, TPP)

That attitude doesn’t exist on this website. Jezebel has been highly critical of Hillary Clinton on a variety of issues.

“The Clintons”? Oh, don’t do this. “The Clintons” are not running for president, any more than Donald Trump posed nude recumbent on a fur rug for a skeevy men’s magazine.

Hillary Clinton is probably literally the most scrutinized person in the history of planet. From the number of tell-all books written about her to the congressional investigations to the Citizens United videos to the fact that there is an entire non-profit dedicated to just suing her and her husband non-stop. …

Literally no one is pretending this.

Nice people that are millionaires? Yes, democrats.

Stein is anti-science, or at least comfortable with courting the votes of anti-science voters.

You’re acting like people don’t have legitimate critiques of Stein. Anyone who thinks they are compromising their political ideology if they vote for Hillary Clinton but is fine with voting for Stein, despite her repeated panderings to the pseudo-science folks (most notably anti-vaxxers) is kidding themselves.

I like this designation a lot. He represents a fundamental shift backwards in the progress this country has made. The striving for a more perfect union isn’t just a platitude. It is something that can be measured in the blood of those who payed for it. People have fought and died for religious freedom, free speech, to…

Trump is what I would call a part of the “Regressive” Party.

I think it is important to repeatedly emphasize Trump does not represent modern conservatism as we have come to know it historically. The GOP has metastasized into a full-on personality cult and is now a delivery system for White Supremacists and other fringe-right wing ideologies into mainstream politics. The raging…

Farenthold is already needling Trump’s people with that. I love him.

This is a self-righteous Bernie Bro you’re talking to. Be sure before you ask that you want an answer to your question. Me? I avoid him entirely.

Are you under the impression that Bill and Hillary Clinton are the same person? Or that she might not have her own ideas about medical privacy?

Hmm. Glass being a filthy person would be kind of fun, but my money’s on the condo board being bananas.

Look, Sophie, I get why you are writing this angle, I really, really do, and I have some sympathy in a macro sense where I would say “Facebook is going to tailor this internet experience to benefit them” but everything is kind of relative, yeah?

This article is so fucking off base. Nothing the Clinton camp is doing implies that they wouldn’t comply with a legal court order or warrant to decrypt their files. What she does or you do or any private or public agency does to encrypt files has NOTHING to do with complying with a court order or warrant.

It suppresses your voting rights how?

I feel like a person whose introduction to porn was their rapist abductor kind of doesn't have the most level starting point for a conversation about the subject. But maybe that's just me.