I don't think it's that weird that the characters didn't seem to care all that much about Frank. Of course Jin and Sun are going to occupy their minds because they knew them for way longer, and their deaths are far more sad, to the characters at least, if not the audience.
But yeah I think Frank is dead. Being knocked…

I thought he meant that Jack is going to be the one who will replace Jacob.

Right on, Radzinskyitude. It's you and me against the whole spoilery world.

yes Michael Fox has certainly come a long way since Alex P Keaton

In the end, I guess it didn't matter which Kwon was the candidate.

I think the show has made it pretty clear that he is. Plus Darlton has said so.

The Candidate
So Sayid basically told Jack that he was the candidate, yes? How does he know this information or that he needs to find Desmond? I guess Desmond probably told him at the well. I hope we see a flashback to that scene or something.

Smokey can't kill any of the candidates. He was lying to Jack in the beginning. But he wanted them all dead. So his plan was to get them all together and have them blow themselves up.
If Sawyer had listened to Jack and not touched the bomb, it wouldn't have gone off like the dynamite. But because Sawyer touched it and…

I get the feeling that Sawyer will die to redeem himself like Sayid did. Probably in the finale. No denying that everyone's deaths were his fault, though he was misled.

I posted a complaint about posting that spoiler post in that article without reading it and people jumped all over me. It just seemed unnecessary and like a slap in the face to the creators who try to keep it secret. And I love discussing the show here so I want to keep it spoiler free. I'm glad you all feel similarly.

Wow, why don't you try to actually read my comments before launching into the ad hominen attacks.
I clicked on the link to make my initial comment, not to read the spoilers (and I had assumed that the spoilers wouldn't actually be posted on this site, but that O'Neal would provide a link to where they could be read,…

Um, he didn't just post a clickable link, he posted actual information. I stopped reading just in time.
And how do you make the jump from my comment about poor taste to stupid political stances?
Anyway the reason I felt that it is in "poor taste" is cause not only does it feel like a big fuck you to real fans of the…

Why would you post this here?
I haven't read the above spoilers and don't plan to, but here's why this makes me mad. Noel Murray tries to maintain his episode talkbacks as a spoiler free zone and I've been pretty grateful for that. But by posting this here, it's like you're endorsing all sorts of spoiler talk, and now…

So some Catholics feel one way, some feel another way. What an astute thread.

@TheJuggernautBitch Sure, but that's not really a fair way of looking at it. By that logic, any film antagonist, supernatural or otherwise, could be labeled a "monster."

I could easily have seen how the movie would continue without the monsters. That's when you have the characters really start playing off of each other, and see what happens to this particular group of people in that particular situation.

I'm the original poster and I'm definitely a horror fan. My all time favorite movies include Alien and The Shining, and I'm pretty well-versed in the genre. Nobody gets more excited for a zombie movie than me. But saying that monsters are necessary for a movie to be a horror movie is really quite dumb. They can have…

Descent without the monsters
Actually I'm one of those people who feels the film didn't need the monsters. Caves and closed spaces really frighten me, and the film really had me until they showed up. They didn't detract necessarily, but the movie was already so intense without them, and they actually resulted in…

Oh good!
It's nice to see original fare like a police procedural set in Los Angeles get a place on television. What I'd really like to see tho is a medical drama.

you're a little behind on Lost, guy.