You already played the whole game through, then someone else plays the whole game through. What about single player games, you were saying something about logic?

You realize PC is cheaper like you mention because it killed off the used market right? >_>

Are you just an idiot or?

What a mature response... As I already said, If you didn't want the game, then why are you buying it at all? You do want the game, you're just greedy and don't want to pay the creators.

Just as having multiplayer codes restored functionality to used games. But you had a problem with that too. You want the full experience without paying the full price. Stop comparing it to used items that aren't equivalent to a brand new counterpart.

You might as well steal them then, cause you get what you want and that seems to be all that matters to you.

The couch would have less life left to it before it breaks or becomes unusable. Just as a car is still usable but the first 50k miles are gone. A digital item does not however work this way. And what you're describing is being "selfish". Congrats on that.

I should have known better lol.

And you continue to go back to it. Financial analysts have information that the public are unable to obtain. I can see that this is going nowhere. Have fun with your fallacy.

No, you are trying to use the fact that it isn't possible to be proven to make your point. And I'm pointing out the fallacy in what you are doing. Now you are continuing to ignore that fact and refusing to make your point in a way you actually can. I don't expect you to come up with proof because as I said you can't.…

As I already pointed out to you, it isn't equivalent to used physical goods. You get to play the entire game just the same as if it was purchased new. The competition part of your argument has nothing at all to do with used. And of course piracy is bad...

Are you even reading my responses? There isn't evidence, how about you provide evidence that it doesn't hurt the industry? People buying new would continue to buy new without the used market and they continue to make at the very least the same amount of money with the potential for more sales from people who…

If you didn't want them, you wouldn't buy them. You do want them, you just don't feel you should have to pay them for what you want.

Buying new when the price goes down loses all of that too. That doesn't make a case for used. And everyone complained about the activation codes too, cause somehow actually making used worth less was "unfair". Thanks for proving my point in that you wouldn't prefer used that was actually lesser. People want the full…

I'll give you that. You make a fair point.

You can't provide evidence for it as there isn't a way to test it. Just as you can't provide evidence on the contrary. You can simply apply logic and use common sense.

All of the things you listed deteriorate and you are selling the rest of the use of the item. They would be an equivalent argument if the second person buying the game couldn't play the parts that the first person played, like a car the second buyer doesn't get the first say 50k miles back, they continue were the…

I'm just aware of the affects and feel strongly about it. I suppose I was a bit ruder than necessary.

Buying new, when its cheaper, still pays the creators. Buying used does not. The high cost of games is actually related to the used market, it drives up the cost of new to compensate. And just because a company will make plenty of money regardless doesn't ok it...

k?