The only reason I think it's being hinted at is because no one's come out and said it. And Scandal isn't the most subtle show. So I tend to think that if they were indeed screwing, it would shown in a scene like Rosen's and what's her name (Portia's character), or explained in some ridiculous, but highly colorful,…

So you're honestly telling me that if you showed up to your boss' house drunk off your ass and accusing them of conspiring to kill off the person their spouse was cheating on them with out of spite, you wouldn't and shouldn't be fired?

Because to me it's not an incorrect guess, it's a complete lack of deductive reasoning. I acknowledge Bonnie's intelligence in my comment, but the truth is I don't think she's significantly more intelligent than Laurel. She uses deductive reasoning (and probably some exceptional knowledge about Annalise and Sam which…

So I think Laurel, who is maybe my favorite of the Keating 5, has to be fired after her drunken tirade. Not because she said those things, which I don't have too much of a problem with. There's a part of me that thinks she's smarter than all that, but I'm willing to go with. I think she has to be fired for getting it…

Is no one else getting vibes that Cyrus is sleeping with Tom? The bath towel last episode, how close they were in the car this week, the way Tom was looking at him. Am I misreading something, or is this being hinted at?

I certainly agree that the discussion is what they want, and I wouldn't dream of casting disparagements on Pollari's acting by any means; I think he's been great. And I do very much feel as though Eric has shown himself to be wonderfully sympathetic throughout points in the season; this just wasn't one of them for me.

I can agree with that. The question then becomes, do you think that that something, anything, did change in the end? Or was there enough evidence before us to strongly suggest that it did? My vote is on no, there wasn't, but that's just me.

Sorry, but that's not even remotely accurate. Our justice system is totally predicated on the fact that in any given situation, you're faced with he said - she said, and the whole thing is about who can convince a jury that what they said (or more specifically what their client said) is the most true. Empirical truth…

This statement worries me. How much do you know and understand about the kinds of things that happen to a sensitive, cute, young man like Taylor in an adult prison over the course of 5 years? This is the end of his life. Even if you assume he survives it, how much do you understand about the lives of ex cons in…

He's considering it in the moment, I'll give you that, though to be honest the sheer fact that he got back on the app and setup the hook up to begin with, and then gets impatient when the guy is late, really does a lot to limit my faith in that situation.

Taylor's boyfriend being left out of these last few episodes has been my main justifications for all those times that I pointed out how useless he was in these reviews. As I kept lamenting the lack of positive queer characters on this show, people would comment that there was Taylor and his boyfriend. I always thought…

"The only thing I walked from it with is somehow both thought they were telling the truth."

I don't have a problem with the loose ends aspect of the finale. I can agree with the point that the show was saying what it was trying to say and it did that to the best of it's ability. In the wake of the last few episodes, I've been left feeling like I no longer agree with what I think the show was ultimately…

I agree with this but with a caveat: I think the shooting being the event the rape and subsequent harassment and drama was leading up to would have been perfect, if they had a second season to deal with the fallout from it. I say this because I don't hate the school shooting storyline, but I think it's fodder for a…

Terri sure, but we've been talking about that for the last few episodes, so there's nothing surprising there. Though that's not to say it isn't nice and impressive. But Kevin and Eric? I think we were watching two different shows.

Man, I was hoping this show would stick the landing, and instead I'm just disappointed. Not because we never really found out what happened at the party, not because there's no grand resolution. Indeed, I think a lot of the resolutions we found here were well handled and worth it. What bothers me is what has bothered…

With all of that being said, I wouldn't mind it if the show would pull the trigger and use the B word (bisexual). I think it makes sense that Annalise wouldn't feel a strong need to label her sexuality and such, but I also think that bisexuality gets no real play and no real legitimacy in the media. To have a…

I thought the queer narrative in this episode was a bit odd in ways, but I also thought it was something I could more than look past because it's Annalise of ten years ago and pregnant. Not to use the cliche "Pregnant hormones!" excuse TV is so fond of, but because Annalise is clearly shown as being conflicted about…

I hope it didn't seem like I was blaming anyone other than the writers here lol. That's always my point. The writing is good in so many places, but they dropped the ball here in a major way.

I agree with that, but I also think some part of it is about the refusal to back track on initial impressions of her character. These last couple of episodes, Kevin's dad has been way worse, to me, than his mom. So it does seem like the show is backing off of her a bit and leaning more on him.