But why would anyone ever try to pursue independent journalism? Better to leave this kind of thing to the experts from the subpage of a snark-based sports blog.

He gave credit (and made multiple disclosures like this) after being called out for misrepresenting himself as a Times reporter in his bio (or at least for accidentally misleading people to believe he was). A lot of people thought he was one of the Times writers on the big stories this week!

I always see the OP’s argument and think to myself: when these people’s cars break down do they buy a new car? When their toilet clogs because they’re so full of shit do they replace the toilet, all the plumbing or the whole house?

Yup, so instead I’ll just put all my trust in my employer, whose sole objective is to make more money by any means necessary. Solid plan.

Right, though the answer to this is better unions, not no unions.

44 months from the election. What was Trump polling at 4 years ago?

Also, the Democrats rise to power during the Bush years began by tapping the insurgent Howard Dean. The Democrats fall from power was presided over by Tim Kaine and Debbie Wasserman Schultz. It seems like rejection of costal elites is not really a…

I like how you can simultaneously argue (A) that a poll taken 4 years before the next election is good enough evidence to claim that the Democrats don’t need to go towards the left (despite losing almost a thousand state seats on a centerist platform over the last 8 years) and (B) that the dozens of polls showing…

Just to back you up:

Ironically, polls - you know, those things you were defending earlier in this thread. See the link, and compare the “Trump vs. Clinton” collection at top, with the “Trump vs. Sanders” collection a few scrolls down. Multiple polls.

Gee, I don’t know, how about 90% of the polls in Wisconsin, Pennsylvania, and Michigan that showed Hillary up by 5 points or more.

The problem is, you are using shit evidence but treating it like gospel.

Quoting a poll this early gives your argument ZERO credibility. Comparing candidates this early gives your argument ZERO credibility. Just watch, in the coming months, Hillary’s approvals will jump back up again, just like Romney’s did post-2012. Not to mention the poll in question contradicts every other poll in its…

God, the “losing seats because of state parties” shit is so bogus. State parties have very little to do with election outcomes. They may be able to raise candidates by ~1% but elections are decided by national attitudes and waves 95% of the time. It wasn’t possible to stop the Republican wave in 2010 or 2014 and…

Wow, results from one random poll! My opinions are shattered!

My dude, Obama was a once-a-century charismatic talent and he still oversaw the loss of 900+ state legislature seats to the GOP in his tenure

Not only is Trump a gigantic bigot and a clown, HRC lost while outspending him almost 3:1. That alone should tell you how moronic it would be to go with Perez. Dems will crash and burn if they are not united around Bernie’s platform, because

Best ever. Im serious.

I don’t think you understand how nationalization works. You know there’s already dozens of nationalized airlines which compete in the free market against privately owned airlines, right? That nationalization of airlines doesn’t mean less airlines?

What the fuck are you talking about?

no, airport food was expensive before 9/11 too