Graphic scenes of sexual assault.

Pretty sure it goes beyond Marilyn being nude, “actress’ exploitation” here is indicating that these are scenes where she is sexual assaulted.

This is Platteville, CO:

First: It is not possible to analyze patterns and behaviours independently of social constructs because behaviours are social acts. Second: ML isn’t getting anywhere without massive datasets to train on, and all of that data is completely tainted by social constructs.
In most things, I’m pro AI/ML, but it needs to be…

The last one I saw was D3. I got a lot of youth hockey movies to watch before I’m caught up.

Where?

The gay beams emitted from his utility belt just make you think he has invisible pants.

I’m not up on the Black Adam news, but I assume whatever studio is in charge of it is comfortably confident that any film with The Rock in it will make plenty of profit on the international box office, regardless of terribleness.

They’re running a Cormac McCarthy adaptation now, ‘Stow Country for Do Nuts.’

Sounds like you answered your own question there, OldManOfTheMountain.

Nah, it’s because they’re all raised in the DD cult. I can’t fathom the point of getting a donut at a place with such terrible coffee.
I really hate the reductionist argument that there are only ‘just normal, don’t ask for nothin’ fancy’ or ‘hipsterized’ choices for things. When I lived in Boston, the best place was…

Oh man, I read it as Halle Berry multiple times (I guess I am not hip to the musics of today), and was really confused by the casting.

Yes.

If he’d gone into a fabric store and said he needed a fabric sample, there’s a decent chance they would have just given him a small cutting for free.
At the very least, in-store they don’t force you to buy fabrics in whole-yard unitss anyway.

Disinterested is not interchangeable with uninterested.

Weirdly, I found this episode very uneven. Might have been the feed, but a lot of the standard movements felt jerky even though the depth on the opening scene felt very accomplished.

I genuinely can’t remember the actual send-off, but I remember it seeming pre-recorded in the event of some catastrophe and having ‘to a great farm upstate where he can run around’ vibes.
Like, you’re welcome to live in denial, but some part of you knows, right?

“Great! So you’re going to get everyone in Canada to approve every law, then.”

The good news is, at least you don’t have to argue about the value of the queen anymore. You get to argue about the value of the king.
(Dollars to doughnuts, those conservative wingnuts are more-than-slightly less cool with answering to a king. Is it semantics? is it misogyny? either way...)

The comparison to the American situation is not super convincing because amendments are ‘literally’ (yes, literally) changes and also have themselves been changed (18th and 21st) without diluting any of the fervor of the ‘originalist interpretation’ cadre.