As does the steam controller. Also you can have the configs follow the controller to other machines. There is even a way to share your configs with others via steam.

The Steam controller is a nice compromise for those used to using a K&M especially for those who have their pcs hooked up to their 55" TVs.

If you use a steam controller you can change any button to to just about anything, and now those configurations follow the controller to other machines using steam. The touchpad type parts take a little getting used to, but can be a lot more accurate than thumbsticks and are a nice compromise for those used to using…

“oil-girlfriend”

This show is just going to suck.

He would be a featured extra, so yeah, I guess. I think that gets him a private changing room, probably in the honey wagon as well. :)

Well, In the TV world, extra means they can’t have any lines and just move around in the background, acting like they are doing things.

So, It’s more acidic?

2 IT guys. One to screw it in, the other to make sure you turn it off and on again.

From the screenshot in the article, It’s windows... but isn’t it always.

This is why I only use Windows 10 to play video games. No email. No web surfing. Just games. Now, even if they find a way to infect my system via Steam, all I loose is my game files and some time. I’ll just format the drive and reinstall.   

My post disappeared, so I’m writing another one.

No. Just because some people think of atheism as that doesn’t make it what atheism is. And they are not even close. One implies that an attitude of as certain as we can be the other that there is up to a 49.999999999999% chance. There is a much better chance of aliens landing on the white house lawn tomorrow then…

How about we go with almost certainly doesn’t exist. That’s much more accurate. That would be atheism.

Well, practically, it is. 0.000000000000000000000000000000001 percent chance is in effectively 0. And the chances of there being an all powerful being controlling everything in the universe is even less likely than that. So, in practice, there is no god. Prove it otherwise. Until then, we go with no god exists.

Prove it exists before making assumptions to its motivation.

No one is saying certainty except you. The null is that there is no god. Prove it wrong. If you can’t, and no one has been able to, then we go with that.

There can be no evidence to prove a negative. But in the absence of any evidence and all research turns up negative the default is the null hypothesis. In this case the null hypothesis is there is no god. So it is logical to default to that until evidence comes along. Again this isn’t agnosticism, this is atheism.…

But the null hypothesis is that they don’t, because of aerodynamics, and lack of evidence. Even the hypothesis that they might exist is pretty laughable. So going with the fact that they don’t isn’t a religion, but just logic. Atheists don’t exclude the possibility that someone might come up with proof, just that…

See, you are taking the stance that atheism is on equal footing with religion and that’s just not true. Just like people who think evolutionists and creationists should have a debate. No, they shouldn’t because they aren’t equal. Atheism can never prove that there is no god, but the complete lack of evidence makes…