Again, atheists take the logical stand that there is no god until you can prove there is one. That’s logic. There is no evidence of it’s existence, so until then, there is no god.

Let me put it this way. Do you believe in flying pink polkadot elephants? If you don’t then you are an atheist in regards to those because you know those don’t exist. If someone showed you one you would change your mind, but until then you are going with the fact that they don’t exist.

No it isn’t. That’s atheism. No god until you can prove otherwise.

No, atheism is common sense. When faced with an extraordinary claim like that of the existence of a all powerful being, one needs extraordinary proof. In the absence of that proof, the null hypothesis of there being no god takes precedence. Basically atheists take the default position. No god until you can prove…

No, atheism is saying that you shouldn’t believe in anything without proof. Doing so is foolish. That’s it. Agnosticism is a half measure that denies the simple fact that you can’t prove a negative. There will never be proof that god doesn’t exist. There will only ever be lack of proof that it does. Also, religion…

Exactly. Atheism isn’t a religion just like bald isn’t a hair color. Atheists don’t believe in something until there is proof. Since there is no proof god, they continue with the default position of not believing in it. Just like you are probably an atheist when it comes to a flying spaghetti monster. There is no…

No, there is verifiable proof of their existence, as opposed to god, which has no verifiable proof of it’s existence.

No, it isn’t. It is the absence of belief in the absence of proof. Religion is belief in the absence of proof. One is logical, the other is fucking insanity.

Probably many things, but really, you can buy a dot for $40 and put one in every room. And you don’t have to have a computer running, or worse yet, a computer running windows 10.

Probably many things, but really, you can buy a dot for $40 and put one in every room. And you don’t have to have a…

So with load times it’s still 20 hrs right?

So much Troll in one little doll... sorry “action figure”

Well said. I might also add that the longer you wait the more time you give a fire to grow, which can put the lives of firefighters in danger. I’m sure they would be a lot happier to get there and put out s small kitchen fire, than risk their lives putting out an entire apartment building.

Yeah, like I said, a big FU to the audience. This is Moffat we are talking about. Frankly I would like it if they killed off Bill. Don’t get me wrong, I think she is great. One of the few characters that see through The Doctor’s BS. But I just love the idea that the original cyberman was Bill. A character with a…

Well, as I said in a previous comment, this could all be a test for missy. Remember, they did kind of allude to that in the beginning and we did just have a story arc where the monks used a near perfect simulation of the earth. Maybe the Doctor... sorry Doctor Who... is re-using the monks tech and delayed them on…

I would need a little more than pen and paper for that, so good on you. Love to see it when you are done though, that would be interesting. :)

Nope. I was right there with you. I did a little quick math using the dual clocks shown (they made it easy because it was 365 thousand 34 days) and the top and bottom of the ship at the beginning of the episode are just about 1000 years 1 month apart. The top floor is at day 2 so that puts them around 500 years per…

I hate to say it, but this could all be just a test... a simulation like the monks made, just to see if the missy is evil. It would be a huge FU, but it was kinda set up. Who knows though, I could very well be wrong.

“The fact is that everyone who does not have some adverse side effects from statins, should be taking them...”

Jesus Christ, who the fuck cares about the font?

I think you mean episodic adventures, less serialized. All they have been doing is serialized. More villain of the week would be episodic.