treesloth-old
treesloth
treesloth-old

Christina Hendricks is hopelessly typecast. Have you noticed that she never plays anything but staggeringly gorgeous women anymore?

Wow... that looks much more arrticulable-y than mine. Mine's basically just a car dock. Thanks for the pointer.

Wow... That's on the Christmas list. Many thanks.

I'm more curious about the video itself than its contents. I went yesterday on a nice mountain drive— seeing the fall colors, not racing— and tried to make some video clips. It's a pretty poor setup— my HTC Evo 3D on a suction-cup windshield-mounted cradle. Predictably, it was decent color and resolution, but with

OMGICBHFBTIA

Maybe the picture-taker deserved it.

A: Kid's toys, ceramics, yachts

Shouldn't an article intended to show that a person is reviled by an entire profession be spelled correctly? Good heavens, Giz, learn to spell; or. if you just can't bring yourself to be at peace with proper spelling, at least bury the misspellings deeper than the first sentence.

No doubt. We're talking top shelf at that price— 3 STD's or less.

People just don't respect the classics anymore. What happened to the good old days of just kidnapping their kids and forcing them to check in every 10 minutes, or else?

How does a grappling hook help? Is it a way to get into her bedroom or something?

So, sex doesn't *literally* blow your mind. It simply blows it in a different figurative sense.

No doubt. Someone should clean this site up, make it spic-n-span.

Strange... mine doesn't have a sidebar on the main page. It does have a picture, though, and when I clicked on the story I went to a page with a big "Jalopnik" logo at the top. That page does have a sidebar with this "story"? Guess what that entry in the sidebar has? That's right— both a picture *and* a tag!

THIS IS JALOPNIK!!!

Wait, what? Pr0n from Virgin? That doesn't work at all. So confused...

A. B&N Nook Color w/CM7.

Yup, pretty much. I found them appropriate tributes and decent expressions of farewell. Gizmodo, on the other hand, has failed to point out any legitimate criticism, and instead is counting pointing and snickering and "amirite, guyz? Guyz?" to provoke discussion. Pretty damn lame.

Nope, and the same principle applies. If you pick up your monitoring and swing it to and fro, it'll Photoshop faster.

It's still a fail. I zoomed and enhanced the reflection in the windshield. I saw a woman being mugged by large man in a t-shirt (which read "Care for a slice of Pi?", followed by the first 5000 digits of pi) on a forest trail next to two humping squirrels. That obviously wasn't happening in the final image.