traveshamockery-old
Traveshamockery
traveshamockery-old

@Disco Choo: Sources tell me it wasn't his fault.

@xCoolJackx: Bullets get stopped pretty easily by intermediate barriers, actually, even to the extent heavy clothing has a demonstrable negative impact on the wounding potential of a bullet. Handgun bullets usually only penetrate 10-14" into ballistic gelatin, and that stuff can flow out of the way. Ice can't. It's

@Tudza White: Suppressor is more technically accurate, since they don't totally silence the shot, but "silencer" is a perfectly acceptable technical term.

@Wayne Schmidt: This is a blog, which by definition includes a writer's personal or professional take on a topic. If you want reporting, buy a newspaper.

@KeyserSöze: No sweat, I've done the same thing. Fortunately, it's good news...

@zkosn3: The date they've stuck with from the beginning is 1Q 2011. It's not like they're throwing random dates out there and hoping to be right. We'll find out in 3-6 months if it's true.

@KeyserSöze: Maybe read the actual WSJ article before commenting, hm?

@KingKash: Others are allowed to see your totem, but they can't touch it. Cobb would have recognized a difference in the weight or balance of the top if it had been someone else's dream.

Hohohohoho MAGIC!

@mperrone: This. But maybe instead of AJ, it's Jezebel writers.

I suggest one cycle English 101 and two cycles Composition 201.

@N@tedog: Just kidding with you, friend. I didn't read the linked article either. Sorry for the offense.

@Curves: Of course there aren't. They put them all through a wood chipper.

@N@tedog: Well, basically: Stuxnet—which some experts consider the most advanced virus ever—appears to be focusing its attacks on Iranian nuclear plants. Now, the Pentagon and German intelligence are being accused of creating the virus to take down Iran's atomic weapons program.

@Nick Reuter: Hopefully it works. Unfortunately, in some situations, there's no substitute for boots on the ground. Even soldiers will tell you that.

@vrey_oneida: @vrey_oneida: It's clear to me that you're trying to maneuver out of your own broad-brush generalization without saying you were wrong.