I would like to request that Ms. Spheeris write an autobiography . . . growing up in traveling carnivals and becoming a successful filmaker AND facing down the Wicked Letch of the West AND to come out the other side a punk rock lady with zero fucks to give?!? More, yes, please.

When they do the soundtrack part of the end credits, they need to have a bunch of Queen songs listed under other artists’ names.

This is an incredibly unfair assessment. He can also talk about issues important to young white men.

Make no mistake about it. The powerful special interests in this country have unbelievable power and they want to maintain the status quo. They have unlimited amounts of money to spend on campaigns and lobbying and have huge influence over the media and political parties.

Just endorse Warren my dude 

It’s not Cowboy Bebop unless they get Yoko Kanno and the Seatbelts making music for it.

I don't think we get to say what's appropriate when it comes to someone else's grief. 

Now it’s Toy Story 4: The Search for Spork.

The idea of using the Fantastic Beasts book as the basis for some retro-Indiana Jones adventures seemed like a pretty decent premise for a series, to me, so I really don’t get why they decided to use it for what is basically a rehash of the conflict of the original series.

You know the real problem with voter apathy?

In the future we will all be killed by the past.

Why does everything have to be underwhelming or overwhelming? Why can’t something just be whelming?

duh, It’s about Time.

I’m not a fan of the series (Tom Cruise is just so Tom Cruise in everything), so I was dragged to this by my husband. Loved the action scenes, but I was LOLing at all the exposition that was slipped into dialogue.

There’s just so much here. Part of the reason this situation feels so odd and unprecedented is because, as the letter alludes to, this is an extremely nuanced situation that is being handled in the court of public opinion- a court that is famously bad at handling nuance.

I don’t agree with that at all. The indirect description of him isn’t her being sly or coy. As a non-lawyer, she would be worrying about whether she could name him directly or not in her account.

“that means she didnt find it important enough to back up her accusations in a formal investigation from Chris’ employer.”

Or it means she said her peace and you shouldn’t read anything into it, asshole. 

kinda diminishes her stance and makes her original statement suspect.

I’d be at peace with that. Can you imagine another queen, maybe Bianca, as the head judge?

I’m turning 38 in a few weeks, and I must say, BRAVO! to me. I know my body’s quirks and sensitivities, I know my physical assets, and the right products to use on them to accentuate the positive. I’m happy to only ever use my vagina for “fun things”, as I am already a loving mother to my rescued cats. I go to the…