It's very depressing when you lot track down an interesting interview and actually profile someone of worth. I mean, stick to stealing other people's content and snarking on your betters. Makes you easier to pigeonhole.

The two words you are herniating yourself not typing? "Top. Gear."

Unwatchable.

Aw, "resorted it." Even your typos are Anglo-friendly.

Not admitting/realizing how lame this video was and this list is was your first mistake.

Privately owned plate offices in Florida? Ahem. Maybe you folks should stick with whining about that speeding ticket you got in Virginia.

First reference, put the dude's first and last name and his association with Kraska. Journalism 101. Even when you're stealing somebody else's reporting.

"Bank Job" is his best film, though I loved "Lock, Stock." "Crank" is some sort of Statham masterpiece, "Transporter" was a great vehicle. And "Wild Card" is "Homefront" with a much better writer (William "The Sting/Misery") Goldman. So plucking this one out for praise simply because you spied it on Redbox is a little…

There is a lot of "you" here, to be sure. But an awful lot of Zuckerman. And a single measly link to the LA Times piece. Another blow struck for Gawker Media's lack of moral underpinnings re: what constitutes "fair use" and what is simple plagiarism/headline trolling.

The lack of Westerns here suggests further evidence that Gawker Media is peopled by children whose idea of wilderness is Central Park on a weekday.

The self-policing monopoly that is the NFL only has to run out the clock for a few days on this stink. Short of vacating the outcome of the game, they have no vested interest in maintaining that nursery school rhyme that Bellicheat (Thanks, Don Shula!) never learned — "Cheaters never prosper." Think of the decades…

That's actually far more interesting than the story swiped from the Guardian that Deadspin put a headline on and summarized.

Touche.

Actually, the headline and the tone of the piece suggests just that. Why post a photo of a police report if not to insinuate something nefarious or damning? CNN quoting some asshat from the Swimming Hall of Fame? Seriously? This is thread gathered to reach a conclusion, and since vigorous outdoor physical activity…

Excellent suggestion. No matter how tricky it would be for refs to decide which flag is in which pocket, the idea reduces opportunity for game-fixing mischief.

It's not a "snub" or racist to omit a middling film passably performed, which only OPRAH thought of as an Oscar sure thing. "Selma" had mediocre direction, less than inspiring performances. It IS a snub to skip past "Belle" and Gugu Mbtha-Raw, certainly a top five performance, probably the best performance by an actor…

Interesting, but you have nothing here that remotely constitutes some sort of smoking gun. The fact is, this sort of thing happens more often than you'd think. That's one line of inquiry you ignored. It doesn't happen to semi-famous jocks, but people tumble overboard, have their undersized boats swamp, etc. I live on…

A. He traveled. B. The Magic won, "indictment" or not, Timothy Burke. So the take away? NBA "violations creep" is a non starter, has been since Dr. J. started that three and four step dunk nonsense and the short guys in the stripes were ordered to look away. And showboats on losing teams are derided on a Deadspin…

Hah! Deadspin cracking on other organizations' diversity. Any straight black males (or females) over 40 working there? Perhaps adding a couple of grownups to your staff would curb your incessant ageist trolling.

Ben Cohen, author of the Wall Street Journal article this is cribbed from, went to Duke according to Linked In.