why spending that much money on a lock, when today’s paper-houses are so poorly built, that you need a small hammer, or tiny crowbar to make a whole in the wall surrounding doors?

No one mentioning Existenz ?
One of my top movies.

hehehe, love your reply.

ok, I might have been misinformed, but wasn’t some head of IRS, linked to the government in place, emailing to target a category of people through taxes, based on all the data that they have?

already did, the “IRS tea party scandal”

Intelligence is needed, spying is needed, the issue is not with NSA,

I’ve heard you can be safe in isolation in jail, no safer place, why don’t you go there and make sure you do not vote, as that is scary.

OK, I am a bit harsh on you, I just red your other comments, you seem ok. don’t take it for you then.

if you allow them to do it once, say for terrorists, without safeguards and limits, then they will do.
Next is some other thing, say: the porn you watch,
or the comment you made on ecology which goes against the establishment.
Once one is allowed, the other follow.
I surely hope you are the only one who never learnt…

did you mean, your descendants?

Hallowed are the Ori.

They are not so good.
They have only one type of burger (single or double patty), a weird sauce, no mayo for the fries.
and pricey.

Fresh fruits and veggies suck in US nowadays.
for the god Profit, they are cut green, and ripe during transport.
Ignoring the fact that the last days of ripening, they need the sun and the soil to develop most of their sugars giving them taste, and juiciness as well.

50$ is really cheap

hmmm,
it is at least part of the problem, as that is how they do their PR / promotions, to get people radicalized (and converted).
Many other things need to be done, but ignoring that part is now going to help.

ok, got it.

thanks, so possible to shut down these sites, in US, or access to them, as long as they call for killings.
With possible extension to sites that preach that ideology AND link to the sites that call for killings?

ok got it. thanks

oh, yes, that I agree to, US sites only.
They might just extend a little bit, in one form, without taking down the websites.

I am trying to understand the reach of the law,
so if I call (and I do not) for say, a group of people lambda (clearly defined) to go on the streets, and kill every person that has a green hair color?
I am free to do so, without consequences, if people do kill? and without the law being able to stop me for calling for…

by Private, does the law define it as against public, or as personal ?
In both cases, these websites are neither personal (kept for one-self) nor private (in the sense of public). we are talking public expression of one’s ideas. so there I am unsure.
For the second part, how is a website clearly stating take arms and…