tototutulapanpan
tototutulapanpan
tototutulapanpan

damn gawker not allowing me to star you again and again

Oh I didn’t mean it that way, but re-reading my comment, I understand now. :)
I wanted to put more emphasis on the cliches that young people, expected to remake the world, open to change, pushing it, and the older generations being more conservative.
Being 43, I see that this is not the case at all, and more than that:

oh, I didn’t get it that it was you you were talking about.
My hat to you, sir.

try domino and notes in 1998

At least, even at 60, he had the wisdom to understand things are changing, and he needs to adapt.
I am sure (I met many) that he could teach that part at least to a lot of the young web developers that were there.
This does not apply to web developers only, but I am amazed at the amount of young people I meet that fear

Last mile unbundling.
and forbid every layer of government to get money to setup a local monoply or duopoly. (State fees, county fees, city fees, community fees...)

just a remote settlement when the main city got overcrowded.

Unless you install many systems constantly, and work with a cabling company, that does it all . cut the cables, terminates them, test them, connect them, and tidy up the system.
Which is the case in most telecom industries

I’l just say “ekki-ekki-ekki-ptang-zoom-boing”

You are absolutely, 100% correct.
now can you just to the edge of the earth, fall over, and make sure you time it so you can fall onto the sun that is revolving around us, and burn a 1000 burning death surrounded but 1000 virgins.
If you are lucky, you might find a flying unicorn in that world YOU live in, and he will

and the same judge will charge the jury for sex offense, threats of rape, and I am sure he can pull out a couple dozens more charges in the same line, that is what he is good at apparently.

That is the case.
and the old debate is: do we, as a society accept to have people killed without a good reason for an overall safety? or should that tolerance zero, in which case, as accidents happen, the right to kill should not be allowed.

I fully agree with you.
But we are not talking about the same thing.
if you point a gun at someone, then it is fair game, and if you end up killed, then be it (even though, many countries, police do not Shoot to kill, rather, they incapacitate)
Here, the On-topic subject is , if you run from police, you are shot

None of these listed offenses / crimes is punishable by death in the law, and definitely none without a proper trial.
separation of powers: lawmakers write the law, judges interpret the law, police enforces the law.
When a policeman, even if only one, takes to him/herself to decide on an arbitrary way that someone is

For a second or two, I missed the last word of your sentence.

Someone had to come here with a serious comment about guns, violence, pollution, yada yada yada...

hehe, fair play to you then.

You’re such a liar.
Streets here are not paved with gold.
Do not entice them that way.
It is Platinum, and we do not need to share.

WOW, I read the comments on the same site as you, I honestly feel good about that.
the above put aside, are you working on anything, that would not be a secret nowadays?