totalimmortal85
Totalimmortal85
totalimmortal85

It's already happened. She was involved in the 2013 Villains Forever comics and was a one a one shot Killer Frost #1 during the Villains Month.

Okay, the scan in question isn't from her Solo series. It's from Detective Comics and taken out of context. She's a Suicide Squad member. They are ordered to do these things by Amanda Waller and the government. Keep that in mind. The solo series remade her character separate from the Suicide Squad books.

Actually you're half right and so am I. A trademark is used to contextually protect an idea, brand, or phrase. Someone can in fact sue over the use of a word used in a product, even if it is a different product. For example, the word Droid. The word Droid is owned by George Lucas. Any other uses of the name must be

It's a trademark clause rather than copyright. Those are sadly, two separate things. For example, you can make a robot, android or any other cybernetic contraption, just do not call it a Droid. That name is owned by George Lucas.

I'm with you. I own it on PS2 and was one of my fav games from that era. I snagged up the PC remaster when it dropped and....played fumbled through the first few minutes. Even trying ot use a mouse and keyboard just made it way worse. I was pretty sad about this actually :(

It's not terrible? It's biggest issue with using Batman is that it tries to ham-fist the villains in. It's literally like,

...sigh...there's one in every flock.

Go deeper with history man. Please. Why don't you include the Irish on that list?

Yup. Star Wars. Had Bucky beat by about a decade. Han Solo's pal Jaxxon!

Slightly off-topic, but, sadly, kids read more today then they ever have. They spend hours reading Tweets, FB messages, Texts, Google, Wikis etc. They read so much information it's actually astounding. The issue is that their attention span, and retention of said information has dwindled, also the quality of what

For a bit more info, Whiz Comics/Fawcett Comics had the character first. However, he was more than heavily based on DC's Superman. Basically Cap was a copy of Superman's powers, but made his powers magic-based rather than on alien DNA. DC lost the initial case in 1948, but didn't give up. In all reality it was due to

lol I noticed that too, but then I realized. He'd found all the bits of code, and such, and has pulled them apart. Now that he's found all the sectors and files on the disc, he still has areas where that code goes and what it means.

Hey man, hugest apologies. I've been looking at a graph of stats involving the profits/budgest of these films back and forth. I literally was looking at the wrong column when I wrote that last response so yes, my numbers are off. Terribly. Forgot what column was what while back and forth between tabs. Pie in the face

You know, it was the way they handled the Inhumans set-up that finally made me a fan of AoS. I won't even lie about that. I'm seriously looking forward to more.

Firebug, an open-source plug-in for Firefox allows me to directly edit and save changes to a web page as long as the code isn't proprietary or pulled from a .php database. So yes, I can do that Firefox. In Chrome however, I don't need a plug-in to do that. I simply hit Shit+Ctrl I and I'm off, but I can't physically

I have been having this argument all freaking day. Seriously. ASM2 did right there with Winter Soldier and did better than Thor 2. It wasn't a trainwreck, just disjointed and paced oddly. Too much.

Fair enough, as I won't relent that Marvel wanted it to happen more. Who else would want their little buddy-bug back home more?!

No, it is semantics. It's your meaning versus mine, which is semantics lol. But that's okay.

Domestic box office has very little to do with a studios bottom line. It is the worldwide box office that they look at now. Most films in general do not do 50% of their revenue from domestic release, it is mostly from the overseas markets.

No, I've met a few others that didn't like Avengers. It's not about whether it's a genre film or not. It's about the film in it's aspects as a piece of cinematography. Dialogue, internal consistency, contradictions with previous films, set pieces, plot points and the entire 3rd act - those are what I had issues with