toronto-will
Will B
toronto-will

Not necessarily. Just open your tweet with a compliment to Trump, and a network of Russian bots will retweet you for an audience of millions. Even better, they can’t detect sarcasm, so the compliment can actually be an insult.

LucasFilm was also Indiana Jones, and it had a ton of special effects talent with ILM.

The legs are the thing that annoy me least about this poster. Why is the top of his head reflecting light like an ocean in the horizon? Is he wearing a mirror-surfaced yamaka? Or is there a second micro-star revolving around his cranium?

Americans are allowed to believe in Republican policies. Bad apples in the barrel doesn’t obligate them to start electing Democrats, anymore than it would have made sense for Democrats to start electing Republicans when Bill Clinton was being accused of sexual misconduct (or if you need a more up to date example, take

I know that this won’t win me any upvotes, but it’s just not fair to accuse Alamabans or Republicans nationally of thinking that liberals are worse than child molesters.

Not just his own words. His own actions. Those are things he’s been credibly accused of literally having done:

Upvoted for name synergy. But it’s already renewed for a second season.

It is not at all a stretch to call what Trump described himself doing as sexual assault. Trump may certainly think “they wanted it”, but the law doesn’t let him assume that. It has to be objectively reasonable to believe there’s consent, if not an outright explicit communication of consent. If what Trump thought they

I actually think it’s refreshing to reminisce back on a simpler time, when giggling along with a predatory asshole’s narcisstic boasts of irresistable sexual prowess was a fireable offence. Nowadays, said asshole is President, a torrent of public figures (far more beloved than Billy Bush) have turned out to be

I’m a subscriber, and they do a fantastic job. Their reporting of the Joe Barton story was a rare mis-step for them (they took a highly editorialized angle that the facts didn’t really support).

Ahhhh, THAT’S why this somehow a news item: she didn’t smile!

I’ll agree it must be a challenge to construct plot excuses to integrate these characters into a movie, and I can imagine that having a solo movie in place as a foundation might make it easier (particularly if it anticipates the “team up” and starts moving some pieces into place). Wonder Woman in BvS is a great

I’m going to sound like quite the contrarian, but I disagree with all three comments up thread:

The dislogic of that joke was noticeable to me, too. Different writers wrote the episodes, and apparently weren’t in tune with each other (or maybe Micro’s nudity was a directorial decision that wasn’t scripted in advance). I’m sure they figured it out at some point, but probably liked the joke too much to edit it out.

We’re left to assume that there’s a brewing sex scandal, and the studio is just getting out ahead of it. It’s always the ones we most suspected. Dammit Lizzy Caplan!

The “girl” isn’t a source for this story. It’s just the police report, in which the woman isn’t unidentified.

Longer isn’t always better. I personally tend to prefer the TV format for storytelling versus movies, but there is something to admire about the skill it takes to establish the same characters and tell the same story in 2 hours instead of 6 or 10 or 13. It forces the actors to be better, it forces the screenwriters to

Of course, yeah. Even if I didn’t know already, it’s in the first sentence of the article I’m commenting upon.

My immediate reaction to this, as someone who remembers the movie fondly, and thinks it holds up very well, is “why bother?”. But I think the exact same thing could have been said about Fargo, and that turned out really well.

I adore Daisy Ridley exactly as much as I detest Josh Gad (a lot). So I’m not sure how to feel about this.