There must be some weird contractual thing over the name, right?

Blumhouse seems to be one of the last production studios that realizes if they make a bunch of films for a total of 100million that only one has to hit vs the majors that are like a handful of films for 100m each and they all have to hit.

Don’t forget how the lack of syndication.

Tell that to Spider-Man. 

Am I out of line or is this ideal that starting your careers in anything that isn’t a movie being beneath actors a very American train of thought?

This is my second reply, apologies, but I funnily enough was up to the Beard episode of Ted Lasso in a rewatch.

I look at it more as a respite.

Why do people hate fun?

I’m cautiously optimistic about S3.

You’re in luck.

Once I remember that Rolling Stone started as a vanity project for Jann Woerner to meet John Lennon and it’s almost single handily responsible for the sexist underlying behind the whole pop vs rock debate, it becomes real easy to ignore lots of Rolling Stone content.

My take on this has been, it’s okay to like problematic art or art maybe by problematic people as long as you understand what’s problematic about it.

Do you understand that the FTC objection to this isn’t just the short term comparisons but the long term implications?

Haven’t seen the film yet but I think I saw people talking about this specific thing on Reddit earlier.

I think that’s a fair point. I think we’re supposed to believe that they were killing humans and replacing them with droids a lot more than it seems during the big time gap between S3 and S4.

I disagree with this sentiment.

Where was the story supposed to go?

I just rewatched S1 over the last two nights.

Has Bond not always been a fuckboy though?

I just rewatched S1 yesterday, Titus holds up.