If you think that it’s okay for someone to be bullied because their name is Cricket, that makes you the problem, not the name.

Already stated in another post how leftist could admittedly be the wrong word on context.

Once Dick became slang for penis, it’s popularity among baby names as well Richard dropped.

“Leftist” may not have been the right term, I’m not sure I currently have the right term in my vocabulary.

It’s going to be dubbed.

It’s a dumb comment that supports the status quo that everyone should buy the same baby name book and use the same baby names because that’s what’s socially acceptable.

Would the Atlanta Braves be able to keep the name of they just removed all the Native American iconography?

There’s always going to be outliers and exceptions to the rule like the Grimes and Musk name. 

That’s also true

It’s not like that wouldn’t leave room for mystery after that.

Is pot shot the actual term?

I think it’s pretty clear I disagree with that sentiment.

Marginalization may not have been the most accurate term, but I stand by the sentiment.

People taking shots at names is a really big pet peeve of mine.

“Who names their kid Cricket”

T-Minus until the follow-up news wire of Dee Bradley Baker being replaced the as the Voice of an Olmec head in order to hire a voice actor of Central American origins.

I think that AT&T did and will continue to do far more damage to the HBO brand than most people can imagine.

Harry Potter is in two different theme parks and new product is being worked on.

Right

And my point stands that “true next gen experience” isn’t the only deciding factor for lots of people.