While I agree with you about market size, I don’t know why you keep on insisting that KC and St. Louis are the same market just because they are in the same state. They don't overlap.

You keep going back to the premise that the markets for St. Louis and Kansas City are restricted to the state of Missouri. I don’t know why you think that’s the case.

If that is all that matters, why did the Rams leave LA to begin with?

Since when are football teams allocated by state, rather than by market? Neither the St. Louis nor the Kansas City market is confined to the state of Missouri, nor do they overlap at all.

Here’s some numbers.

if you were to make a composite image of every gawker comment every, it would probably look something like yours.

Kansas City and St. Louis are two fairly large markets and they are four hours away from each other.

I get the anger, but it’s just a game. Wishing a mass shooting on anyone is fucked up beyond belief. You should be ashamed of yourself.

I promise it’s okay to enjoy this even if you like something else more.

Sir, just please calm down and we’ll get off your lawn.

Nah, I get the joke, which is why I said it’s odd instead of insufferable.

Better than anything Drake has ever put out.

I’ll never understand the arrogance of New York City residents—like it’s a personal achievement to be born in a certain geographic area or move there. Really odd.

But here’s our 2909980924th story...

Intentionally ironic, and do you recall the mid-60’s? Climate has improved vastly, regardless of what the race-baiters have told you. It ain’t perfect, it’s progress. And it continues, thank God.

I love the race-baiting white guilt dripping off the sensational headline. Assumed hatred is the quickest, laziest most eye-catching go-to for pathetic, needless shit-stirring activist ‘journalism’.

If you have any questions about women, just ask me. I have a girlfriend, but you wouldn't know her—she's a model who lives in Canada.

oversexed, arrogant, and a danger to kids.

No one is using the term freedom of speech that way, and you probably know that. The issue is intellectual freedom, something prized by most faculty and students the preceding 200 years, up until these current times.

I don't hear "Fox et al" trying to muzzle the protestors or prevent them from assembling. They are doing what you say is legitimate: criticizing them for some of the things they are saying. Or is criticism of speech or action only to be directed at white people?