Most philosophers believe in free will by a large margin:
toren1776
toren1776
Will read up on Mr. Fish then...
ye ye, i've read stanley fish too, i don't need a summary
Goddamn moral arguments. They never lead anywhere, cannot be resolved, and leave everyone feeling angry, offended, and exhausted. This is because each side is convinced that they both share the same moral values and that any differences in moral outlook between them must be the result of the other side making some…
Science — Jezebel style.
Check your priviledge.
They should just change it to Immigrant Day — same idea just without the genocidal aspect.
This is not a sensitive subject because white men are not the villains.
That explains why a skit about a genocidal group of Islamic head-decapitators/crucifiers/immolators bent on turning the world into an Islamic State is "hilarious" but a professor telling an indigenous student to write the word "indigenous" with a lower-case "i" is "sooooo problematic".
Japan went from a medieval feudal society to an industrial world power in no more than 40 years — a transition that began with Perry and his trusted Paixhans.
This should calm you down:
"I'm a firm believer in a nihilist's universe."
Social engineers — get to it!
"Oppression".
Heresy/CheckYourPriviledge/SystemicOppression/Whitesplaining/YouAreTheProblem/YouAreEvil
The inevitable paradox of equality: the less oppression an oppressed group experiences the more the oppressor group is interested in the plight of the oppressed group.
It's a sign of progress when a film not getting an Oscar is seen as "oppression".
In other words, we're not born atheists, at least not most of us. As to religion, you forgot "sense of purpose and meaning in life that contrasts sharply with scientific nihilism (i.e. rejection of teleology), absolution from sin (a least in some religions), a sense of hope when you're down, a sense of community, and…
This is why Protestantism is dead.