You missed it. It wasn’t about political commentary until he defended the joke. Before that, it was a joke some people didn’t like, which is totally fine and shouldn’t raise any eyebrows. Then he made it into political commentary when he tried to defend the rationale for the joke. People complaining about a joke they…

Don’t you bring Conan O’Brien into this, I’ll have to bring up his utter lack of doing anything other than late night shows his entire career. I like Conan for reasons that I can’t explain, so let’s let this one die.

It wasn’t about political commentary until he defended his “joke”. Comedians are called out for “inappropriate” or “offensive” jokes all the time. The appropriate response is either to not respond because a joke does not need to be defended, while a political commentary does. Or he could remind everyone it was a joke…

He’s a 34-year-old Harvard grad whose’s only job has been writing jokes for a sketch comedy show. I’m shocked he wrote a whitebread, cliche ridden film. Shocked.

But if it was just a joke then he should have said: “It was a joke. You can like it or hate it but I made a joke and that’s all there is to say about it.” Instead, he’s trying to qualify the joke and his argument, which makes him open for criticism now that he’s crossed over in political commentary.

Gags is such an artist.

More like Ashley FINEberg.

You know that all those things exist because whiny people like me fight for them to exist, right? There is no benevolent source of goodness offering people assistance. I suppose we’ve reached the zenith of public assistance in your mind. These workers are organized and negotiating a fairer, more equitable wage for…

So now you’re the arbiter of how much someone should be paid based on its difficulty level? I could argue that there are a lot of jobs that are objectively easier than working in a dining hall who get paid a lot more.

The breeding ground for elites who don’t care about working class people not meeting the reasonable demands of the working class people whom they employ? I’m shocked.

One time I was playing flag football with a full grown adult male. We made contact after he caught a pass and he tore his ACL. I felt terrible about it. He was super cool about it. The end.

Here is the dumb coach of Foothills Academy backing up Fait Christian, for some reason:

OK. Let’s go point by point;

Honestly, I don’t care if he was or wasn’t. I don’t care that A-Rod was on steroids. I don’t care that Derek Jeter got away with it for 20 years. The Steroid Era of baseball is just another colorful time in baseball history. I don’t feel slighted or cheated in the least.

That’s what we’re talking about here, chief. Otherwise, how would I know that Ortiz was on the list? I don’t know what you’re getting at here.

But we have no idea what he tested positive for in 2003. Ortiz doesn’t even know what he tested positive for in 2003. Also, I do take exception to judging players based on the 2003 survey test. The players volunteered to be tested to establish how great the need for testing in baseball. I don’t think taking them to…

Right, because a Boston fan has never taunted a Boston player. . .

He was on that list of players who tested positive for something that was supposed to be anonymous before real testing started.

Good, Brad Pitt is too good for her. That is all.