If Sanders was the candidate, this would’ve been a completely different outcome. No question. The Democrats and Hillary supporters VASTLY underestimated the desire for serious change and Hillary meant more of the same. Sanders didn’t. Hopefully lesson learned for next time. “Meh” isn’t going to cut it anymore.

Do you live in coal country or Louisville or Lexington?

It’s because, rich or poor, lots of people just don’t like the Clintons, especially Hillary. This isn’t some kind of new development and it’s exactly why I didn’t vote for her in the primaries. Nominating someone who is already unpopular was a really bad choice.

I’m waiting on you guys to do a “Fuck Bernie Sanders” post. You’ve already hit Jill Stein and Gary Johnson, time to do that one as well.

“There will be years of recriminations in our future. Many Democrats will, as is their habit, conclude that the fault lies with the left wing of the party — that progressive party activists did not sufficiently support the candidate or that leftward attacks weakened Clinton. But that notion hides a simple fact: In an…

I don’t think you should blame those people. Clearly, Hillary could not win enough people over. That sucks, but I voted for Sanders in the Primary and Hillary in the General. Both lost because they couldn’t garner enough support. It’s a shame. Clearly they miscalculated how many people have it rough and are…

And this where liberals fucked it up. Bush made mistakes undoubtedly, he fucked up. But he wasn’t the Nazi that he was characterized as. He isn’t mentally retarded like people wanted to paint him. He didn’t become the “I’m keeping the Presidency” authoritarian they said he would. And he was *their* president, even…

But man, isn’t it just next-level gross that we can even discuss this in those terms? Like we have to actually have a talk about a man-a presidential candidate-being “friend-zoned” by his daughters. What is this year?!