This could also really apply to football players.

Debt <> having a net positive asset balance sheet but having a loan anyway.

This oversimplifies the argument. A car will depreciate in value no matter how you pay for it so you have to go back to considerations of your costs of capital. If you draw $30,000 out of an investment account that’s earning 10% per annum over the long term (a reasonable assumption) you lose those earnings forever.…

You’re looking at it wrong. If you have the cash available, then you’re not going into debt for a depreciating asset. You’re going into debt so you can invest that cash in something appreciating.

I no spel good. Hear a jokar man.

Luckily your boy Vin has nothing better to do:

Another reason for Acura’s success:

Acura is cheaper, that’s why they’re selling so well. Cheaper and arguably more reliable. Period.

Yeah, but what’s its ‘Ring time?

I think it’s funny how OHC motors predate OHV motors by few years, but everyone talks about OHV motors like they’re the outdated tech! Simplicity isn’t a flaw, it’s a feature that allows the design to be tougher, last longer and handle more induction with less modification. How is that outdated?

Getting gas? Is a first-world problem?

So... this technology renders the vehicle safe to drive behind Volkswagens?

Unfortunately, not all bioweapons attacks come from outside.

It’s been done once on a subcompact, and of course it’s French. I present the Peugeot 1007.

Yeah, but how’s the driver supposed to get out?

The Accountants. Its alway the accountants.

Completely agree. If it is less than a 7 hour drive I opt to drive.

Oh, so that’s why they call it “drag” racing.

Holy shit you’re right! WTF!

Or just buy crap when you get there. A couple pair of pants and shirts from the clearance rack at Kohl’s. Donate them to a charity when you leave. Seriously, that $50 would just about cover a well-thought-out shopping spree