And...we’re off the rails!

Who said or even implied that it was? No one.

“Can you show me the history of elections in this nation being decided by outsized influence of the smaller states?”

The voters in those small states have a long documented history of voting against their own interest. I like the odds.

Damn. If only we could amend it!

I grew up in a bumblefuck part of the country. Those people would vote for Satan if he had an R next to his name. My condescending opinion of them would not change this one way or the other.

The point of the Senate and the point of the Electoral College are different.
You can’t (convincingly) defend the EC by trotting you your 8th civics lesson about why the Great Compromise was a good idea.

The design of the two house system and the EC are two different issues.

Uh...Electing Reps, Senators, the President isn’t pure democracy, either. Even if every person gets a vote for each office.

This is an argument for the Senate being equal representation.

You are deliberately missing the point of the analogy.

Gerrymandering. Look it up!

It’s really NOT surprising at all that the party in control of re-districting following the Census controls the House.