+1 wampum with happy ending
+1 wampum with happy ending
I feel like the appropriate sexual trade for a Washington scoop is the reporter has a casual glance across the room but actually looking past you at their friends, but you totally waved and looked dumb.
The team is now claiming it was an indirect attempt to honor the Native American tradition of bartering.
It seems like you’re burying the lede here. Is Snyderland so dysfunctional that accusing your husband of having an affair on social media is par for the course?
Would you say that you’re as far to the Left of the center as those people are to Right of center?
Really for me it’s just about the fact that an argument or position with regards to any given topic or issue is not made more or less meritorious based on who said it. Good ideas are good, and bad ideas are bad, regardless of who presents them.
that defended personal liberty and the critical importance that dissenting voices be heard.
“What astonishes me is that the liberal left used to be the side of the political spectrum most concerned with discussion and dialogue. “
I loved that passage too. I was like FINALLY I can feel like I’m not the only one noticing this and not liking it. And from a Jez writer no less.
I agree with this. I remember this article from earlier this year:
It’s been like this for years now. The leftwing is no longer leftwing. They hate transgression, demand apologies but rarely grant forgiveness, and have to point out enemies in society to convince themselves they’re good people. It’s beyond self-righteous, and it’s antihuman, because it reduces everyone to the worst…
I’m growing more and more uncomfortable with the seemingly increasing progressive notion that people’s backgrounds must be fully delved into and punishment doled out for things they did years and years ago, retroactive, permanent punishment. It strikes me as so anti-liberal.
Poor soldier, having to attend a Rams game. Hasn’t he sacrificed enough?
I thought that was Florence Henderson and I was really confused.