The catch-22 is that it’s inherently unfair not to as well.

Also: record interviews with your parents and grandparents, for your kids.  

“From now on, I shall be known as Johnny Curling!”

Let’s not forget, too, that Pakistan is juuuuust this side of a “failed state.” The government spends more time fighting itself than not, ISI runs the Taliban while the rest of the government fights them, a third of the country is practically ungoverned and ungovernable to the point of not understanding international…

This is not as uncommon as you’d think. Between the space industry, defense industry, and medical industry, enough - er, “interesting” - stuff gets improperly disposed of that my reaction to this story is less “Wow!” than it is “Again?”

This is an underappreciated comment.

I have no issue with him wearing a gown.

Could be just coincidence, like they all bought their massage sessions separately from the same Groupon ad.

If you’re going to go that far, make custom tracks that span both rear wheels, and make a damn halftrack out of it.

You don’t arbitrarily and reflexively dismiss their stories as invalid, or devalue them as liars. You support them emotionally without applying any judgement one way or the other, until you have a factual basis for such.

We shouldn’t “believe” victims.

I knew someone in college who used to correspond with her friends like that.

Starred this just for the metaphor, which is awesome. 

Because all hockey players are Robert Downey Jr. playing Sherlock Holmes.

“He’s not hurting the people he’s supposed to be hurting” is the most bipartisan position I’ve ever heard.

Yes, this is called “hoisting Democrats on their own petard.”  

This is not a bad thing.  It’s better than him...y’know...making decisions and trying to run the country.

Don’t forget: all of this unnecessary suffering is because of one stubborn idiot’s obsession with a useless border wall.

In the case of Texas, they were an independent sovereign nation that agreed to join the United States under the terms of a treaty that were violated not even 15 years later. They can claim some legal justification for leaving the Union in having joined it under what turned out to be false pretenses.

You’re working without pay.  Is it even a strike if you refuse to work under those conditions?