Yeah, I’m sure he has had many interactions with “socialist-minded” people and that they have “berned” him! That’s a totally plausible scenario, just like God talking to him.

Bullshit.

“Audiences are not stupid,” writes the commenter, as the joke flies over their head. ;)

Tammy Duckworth endorsed Hillary Clinton. Maybe you're thinking of Tulsi Gabbard?

Killer Mike.

I also loved how Larry Wilmore did not give a single fuck about the audience. He straight up did not care about their opinion or their reactions except to laugh at them for being a tough (white) crowd.

I like almost all of these better than the new logo. The new logo has nothing at all to do with Japan or the Japanese aesthetic.

Seriously, what a petty reason to not buy a game. But hey, your money I guess.

Or just deploy modern irrigation in underproducing areas like Africa.

The genetically modified crop isn’t necessarily the source of the concern. Say you make a crop resistant to pesticides, or herbicides, or whatever - then you go blasting your fields with chemicals to keep your crop growing gangbusters without concern of the crop suffering ill effects. Awesome, right? But the…

Holy shit do you actually believe this?

1) The valuation of Trump’s wealth varies wildly and is largely unverifiable. Also, as pointed out above, he is not actually all that talented in the realm of “making money.” He was privileged enough to start out with enough money to hire the best lawyers and accountants in the game who know how the use the tax and…

Like the hell holes that are Norway and Canada? Spending tax dollars on education and infrastructure rather than endless wars and prisons might be a nice shift back to the U.S. of the mid 20ieth century.

I think that as a congressperson one of your most important jobs is to vote on whether or not to invade/ war with other countries. If you fuck that up, I’m not sure what sort of nuance I’m supposed to allow for here. I personally refuse to vote for any politician who voted to invade as others might for politicians…

Clinton’s Iraq vote isn’t a purity test, it’s a devastating lapse in judgement.

Voting for Iraq was a massive mistake with profound consequences. It should be scrutinized. There was enough information to take a more prudent stance on authorizing a pre-emptive military action: Bush did not make the case that Iraq was an imminent threat to the United States, even then, and then he proceeded over…

A Jezebel commenter graced an article I wrote with a list of “pros and cons” about the candidate that named Clinton’s only con as “hasn’t fulfilled her potential.”

It still amazes me how many people don't understand the concept of free speech. You're a moron.

The sad thing is, it’s a ‘whole picture’ kind of problem. The waste begins all the way at the ground level. Literally. We plant more than we can possibly hope to harvest while knowing only a portion of what does get harvested will actually be utilized. Why? Because only a portion of what we grow is deemed ‘visually…