I wonder if the reason he hasn’t commented on it might be because he and his crew are, you know, in jail awaiting trial? One can only hope...
I wonder if the reason he hasn’t commented on it might be because he and his crew are, you know, in jail awaiting trial? One can only hope...
That seems to be a pretty blanket statement you have there demonizing those with a particular kink and implying that, because of their sexual preferences, they can not have any sort of sympathy for other causes and thusly rather aptly dehumanizes them. That’s what you were going for, right?
The part where you instantly assumed the artist’s gender (which, to be fair, the article never mentions once for some unknown reason) is where I stopped reading your post.
What absolutely disgusting hyper sexualization! Not only is his bare smooth skinned naval completely and utterly visible but they obscure the face so as to dehumanize him! And what the fuck is that to the right of the image. A obviously phallic rocket!? Abominable! *JOINS THE KOTAKU OUTRAGE!*
I dunno, I’ve always moved to one side for people with a smile so as to share the sidewalk and I don’t feel that should be based on sex, height or some other ill perceived pecking order. It’s simply the polite thing to do.
I think context is important here. We’re not talking about somebody saying they are “Triggered” as an excuse to avoid an real life situation. We’re talking about not wanting to see a type of fictional violence. Do you propose people be subjected to it against their will?
A The Root article not rampant with racism! Fear not dear reader; The comments section will fix this for you.
Remove the remaining bit of meat from the cheap soy and wheat filled out patties you’ve been selling for decades, add a few other highly synthesized artificial ingredients for flavour and texture, sell it to people as the newest food craze; Marketing genius.
I’m three episodes in and it’s been a great series but make no mistake that it is a ‘based on’ drama and not a documentary by any stretch of the imagination.
Just don’t romance Aerie.
Why not just call it “Baldur’s Gate: Mindflayer Games [or a better subtitle]”? I’m all for same setting and some shared lore I just hope it doesn’t try to be an actual sequel to a series that had the best ending in CRPG history.
I’m surprised that they are even allowed to sell what appears to be death/skeleton symbolism (albeit rather cartoony) in China.
So, basically, he’s the Quentin Tarantino of the video game industry is what you are saying? I think we all knew that already...
I defiantly would love for Larian to make a licenced D&D game, one in Forgotten Realms no less, but I’d rather it not be Baldur’s Gate 3 (or announced with what makes me think of Quake 3's logo). A new series sharing the same overall lore with cameo or two would be fine though a direct sequel no thanks. Throne of…
*facepalms*
These papers are neither a polished set of meeting minutes nor a prepared speech; They are handwritten notes!
The only shame in this entire situation is that, after a guilty plea, appropriate trial and sentencing for their war crimes, Manning was pardoned for no good reason at all.
Citation needed.
Didn’t everyone stay for the post-credits scene where Jon opens his eyes while finally, truly realizing his self worth before it ends with the entire ensemble standing around him clapping and cheering?
I can think of a few stores where the policy is free (or up to $10-15ish dollars off if it’s expensive) your first item if it scans wrong.