It’s actually a tea tray. A whale tail doesn’t have the sides.
sloppy joseph
tobythesandwich
Shouldn’t that just be two pictures of Saab? Because had GM not prolonged their life they’d have died off in the late 80s or early 90s.
It’s worth noting Hyundai is having problems with these DCTs.
The optional steer but wire system has an electronic decoupler. If there’s a fault in the system it goes right back to being connected.
IMO the telluride looks like trash. The rear especially.
Nissan is a puzzling company. They redesigned the Navarra for 2014. And yet we have the same frontier that we did in 2005. Their other portfolio isn’t that bad. I understand the sports cars because their such a limited market. But it’s weird they continue to just depend on fleet/rental sales for the Frontier.
Yeah except you’re full of shit.
Honestly the Q60 coupes are great looking I think. And they aren’t bad to drive (despite lack of manual) with the 3.0 turbo engine.
I mean there’s plenty to look worse. Those giant SUVs HyKia is making, any SUV that’s a “coupe”, etc. there’s a few things out there.
Overlanding has bypassed America in general. Anytime you mention “off road” it becomes a de facto ’Murican argument about rock crawling and breakover angles. Look at anytime it’s mentioned here with a Rover or Cayenne.
The current Armada is better looking than the bulbous QX80/56. That being said Nissan has become famous for letting things rot on the vine. The WA60 ran for 14 years or so.
Only in size. It’s not very good off-road in the way a land cruiser is. But it’s also cheaper. And it will also be worth a hat full of packing peanuts in 5 years time.
Lol no it doesn’t. It’s the 7-sp auto found in all their other RWD platforms.
Because they built enough Grand Ams and Cavaliers to be able to build something like this. Sure it wasn’t an SL beater. But it wasn’t a bad car, it’s just that there were better options. Which is kind of the GM Ethos since the 70s.
24.9 billion is definitely more than 5.9 billion.
This is the top trim level. Sort of how the 911 base is $97k but the Turbo S is $190k.
You should be measuring your rotors then. Because at the end of the pad life they are likely below minimum thickness.
You may want to hand in that degree then. Because Porsche doesn’t think it’s coating is going to last past a set of pads. They’ll last marginally longer than the base brakes, but not as long as the PCCBs.
They are actually larger inside than both of those.