Recording cameras don’t fall under castle law.

It definitely belongs in a museum. But the direct ties is a bit over inflated considering mostly all major vehicle manufacturer had some level of involvement with their country’s war effort. Porsche was no different. 

Most of it, yes. The second one was tore apart after WWII. They built that one from most of the major bits and pieces left over.

Was this a matter of the techs driving it or some porters?

Devils advocate here: some dash cams do drain the battery in my experience. Several have built in accelerometers in the event that the car is hit while parked. So the camera is always on and is a perpetual drain.

Technically not vandalism. Read up on it when you get a chance. In a lot of cases dash cams also record audio. Just because you scared a few mechanics doesn’t mean that it’s suddenly legal. Dealerships are private property and there’s no reasonable expectation of being able to record their employees. You’ll find most…

All of which you can pay to scrub negative reviews. 

Lol this isn’t even close to true. First: enthusiasts rarely ever put their money where their mouth is. Second: you know what they call a new car with the radio or AC delete? Lost profits.

Yeah I don’t care. I hope not. The 971 has a ton of problems. Mostly due to its heavily audi sourced bones.

Oh my. I’m not sure what country’s education system failed you. But point me in their direction so I can write them a strongly worded letter. Because the base first gen was garbage. The base second gen is okay but a clunky PDK and rubber band throttle response due to the single turbo are hardly “best driving”…

thats not the point. Like. At all. Reread Duder’s comment. It’s not about balance. It’s that the original 944 was a small sports car with a useless backseat. 

You must’ve missed where they said they are banking on Bentley to develop a Coupe off the Panamera platform which would make it financially viable. 

This is a bad take. The first gen may be ugly but it drives so much better than the large sedans it competes against. I can only assume you’ve driven base models. 

The 928 was designed to replace the 911 initially due to concerns over the rear engine layout becoming outlawed.

The original 944 didn’t have rear seat headroom. Why not just wish for an A4 with a Porsche badge?

Because why take the massive depreciation hit when someone else already did? Buying a new luxury car is pretty foolish. 

The question is how much of that is actual reliability issues? Because the biggest problem with customer sources reliability rankings since the introduction of infotainment is old people who can’t be bothered to learn how their radios work. 

I see so many people with radar detectors that never go above the speed limit. Not even because the radar is going off. Just because they drive slow to begin with. 

“Imagine if Toyota had to crash 900,000 cars every time they came out with a new generation of Toyota Camry”

The “carburetor” is just a throttle body. It doesn’t deliver the fuel anymore.