3) Democrats for not putting Bernie on the ticket.

why are you assuming clinton was owed those votes

You’re acting surprised that Americans aren’t engaged politically, like that hasn’t been the case for decades. It just so happens that we had two awful candidates and no one was excited to see what would happen if either won.

I am on the same page as you. It not having an open relationship or arrangement, or whatever that is bothersome. It’s the fact that Bill Clinton has allegedly assaulted multiple women in the process, and Hillary Clinton seems to be ok with it.

Several European countries have different scheduling methods, there is no problem with debating it. When fanatics get involved all reasonable and scientific process gets trampled by the political.

She has repeatedly said she is pro-vax, and you people echoing it all have no shame. This craven, gross, easily debunked smear is absurd. The levels of fiction needed to make Hillary ‘the only choice’ is reaching insanity.

Right now, Dems = right wing, Repubs = lunatic fringe. If you want left, you gotta go elsewhere.

Yes you have. You “use” physics ever single day, it’s just your brain processes the equations for you without you having to think about it. Do you drive a car? Think about braking. Your brain basically tells you when to push the pedal and how much force to exert on it to come to a full and complete stop without…

this is weak. I use physics every day. We cancel each other out, so what’s your point?

Because YOU not using physics or biology is a pretty poor predictor of whether your kids are going to need to, or more importantly want to have the option of, using physics or biology. If you want to make sure your kid is a potter, then all you need to teach him is pottery. But that’s pretty selfish, because neither…

Seems to me like kids still need to learn math, grammar, literature, history, biology, physics, etc. From people that know about that stuff.

In the founding fathers’ time, an armed citizenry actually served as a check on tyranny—but in the age of multi-million dollar force multiplier (i.e., smart bombs; tanks; attack helicopters; etc.), not so much.

Out of curiosity, was Hillary asked if she was racist for trying to get in the way of the first Black president? I don’t remember that happening but I could have missed it. Has Hillary been asked if she is being anti-Semitic for standing in the way of the first Jewish president?

Exactly. These are the same employers who try like hell to get something classified as an ‘internship’ so they can get someone to work for free when there is nothing that furthers their education or experience.

One of the litmus tests has also always been ‘can the employee set his/her own hours?’ and as Wylie so…

Well, David Brooks is a moron, to be fair.

So if she’s disliked simply because she’s a woman, then how can you have any honest discussion about the numerous reasons she shouldn’t be President? At the end of the day, you can dismiss all arguments as “Well of course they’d say that, she’s a woman”. It can’t possibly be because of her handling of this email…

By historical standards, taxes on the rich are very low, while income inequality is getting worse and worse. It’s very very good to be a rich person in the USA. Meanwhile, more and more people feel like their hard work won’t get rewarded. Unless you change that dynamic, maybe you don’t get Greece but you get something…

But if he worked harder to convince a few more people in Florida, he would have been president.

And besides, that implicitly blames Nader for Gore losing, which is false. Gore lost because he didn’t earn enough votes, not because Nader stole them.

I’d say you’re correct. Republicans would come out in droves to vote against Clinton, but a lot of them either wouldn’t bother voting against Sanders or would vote for him to spite the horrible candidates they have.