tmd42--disqus
Tony
tmd42--disqus

Uh, where was this specified?

Even better if he answers: "It's not the years, honey, it's the mileage."

Very interesting. My point still stands, though.

I'm old/young enough to be considered a Millenial (bluuugggh I hate that word) and although I wasn't big on this movie (See solo post I made here), I would like a reboot. But only if they maintain the mood of this movie. Then again, I'm fascinated by WW2 and the 40s themselves. I don't know how many other people would

I watched it a few years ago and I enjoyed it, but I wouldn't put it to the high praise that it's been given here. I thought the Nazi's plan was silly and introduced far too late into the movie. I've been thinking about giving it another chance on Blu-Ray, though, should I?

Yeah, but still, it's not like the marketing for this movie has been going all "Cloverfield" or "Super 8."

"Cars. Family and Butts" would be a great tagline for the Fast and the Furious movies.

Girl acquires a mysterious object that takes her into an alternate world where she discovers an endangered utopia for the great minds of the world, what else do you need to know?

From what I understand, they aren't totally separated from humanity. They contribute to rest of society. So yeah, I guess you're late to the party. And this movie has been in the works for three years. And last time I went to Disneyland I wasn't given any electronic tracking bracelet.

I find it pretty funny how a lot of the people who hate that scene seem pretty okay with the Fast and the Furious movies.

To be fair, this goes outside AV Club. The Leftovers IS a good show (looking forward to the 2nd season) and I give him credit for working with Drew Goddard to patch up the ending for World War Z, which was probably the only part of the movie that made any sense and a good antithesis to the overblown blockbuster

Faraci is unhealthily obsessed with trying to expose Bird as an objectivist. I don't like to read his reviews anymore since it seems like he likes to twist things around just to appease his POV. His review of Interstellar was ridiculous in this regard. And again, I ask: If Bird was an Objectivist and his movies

What what?! In the butt butt!!

I might be more of a Snyder fan, but I don't really like Sucker Punch. I think it's his worst movie overall. But much like all of his movies, it's interesting and I think the people who say it flat out sucks and has nothing to offer aren't really observant about filmmaking as they proclaim to be. It doesn't surprise

Oddly enough, those weirdos seem to have pretty smart arguments to defend the movie compared to those who don't. I'm not a fan of the movie myself, but I don't think it's without some merit or good ideas.

If they can get Azure Ray to perform "Asleep" live every show, then I'm okay with this.

I'm surprised readers haven't complained about the repetitive nature of my storylines. Sure, there's variety, but they all end in the status quo.

Yeah, it'll probably be. IMO, I think that in order to truly revitalize the Spider-Man movies they need a stronger approach. But fundamentally, they just need to make really good movies.

I take it you're not a fan of the Suicide Squad comic, then?