tmajibon2
tmajibon2
tmajibon2

Probably going to be the only one here mentioning them because they’re relative unknowns.

Probably going to be the only one here mentioning them because they’re relative unknowns.

The motto for Alphabet is: “Do the right thing.”

While there’s a lot that can be argued about the differences, what I’ve heard about their official response on the matter was they were aiming to switch from “passive tone” to “active tone”.

“Don’t be evil” implies doing the right thing, but is passive. It discourages

In regards to less money for artists, probably not.

I think it’s a volume distribution balance. Many of the people with Google Music subscriptions likely don’t listen to much music (for instance I only listen maybe a handful of times a month and have occasionally considered just buying my songs and cancelling the

There was a small flurry of articles when it came out, but then nobody talked about it.

The previous terms only covered music videos by labels (whom they already had deals with for Google Music itself).

That Techcrunch article is using really harsh and somewhat biased language... (rage rant tone)

I read it like this: “Hey, we updated our terms of service and you need to agree to them again to continue using our service because we didn’t bake in a ‘we can change whatever we want whenever we want’ clause”

I think it’s