There was a small flurry of articles when it came out, but then nobody talked about it.

The previous terms only covered music videos by labels (whom they already had deals with for Google Music itself).

That Techcrunch article is using really harsh and somewhat biased language... (rage rant tone)

I read it like this: “Hey, we updated our terms of service and you need to agree to them again to continue using our service because we didn’t bake in a ‘we can change whatever we want whenever we want’ clause”

I think it’s…