What I find interesting about this sort of CGI work is when it covers stuff tht isn’t necessarily impractical to shoot in the sense it is almost impossible, but where it must indicate that the CGI has become cheaper than doing it as a practical effect. I can remember the showreel for some of the CGI from the first…
Yeah, and?
The former “Hollywood” refers to actors, many of who are left leaning or Democrats, as a whole, who often championed free speech and opposed Republican government.
And what did “being courageous” do for the Dixie Chicks? Sponsors pulling out, pissed-off ex-fans holding album-burnings, and metal detectors having to be installed at their concert venues due to death threats? Yeah, sounds real good for business.
HG Wells led an expedition to the year 24 078 BCE and became stuck there for seven years. During that time, they taught a local hunter-gatherer tribe some rudimentary agriculture in order to have help producing food and to get the labour necessary to produce tools and fix their time machine. When they left to return…
Cars kill 30,000 Americans every year, so I’m not sure about your claim that “a car is safe if it is respected.” Lots of people die in cars through no fault of their own, much like fireworks.
This is fairly similar to the famous Blue Eyes riddle, only with slightly different numbers. Let’s work through the day-by-day logic:
Hahaha... this formula... I always always smile at it...
I never thought of “Mary Sue” as a gendered term. In fact the way the term was first explained to me was “Like, you know all of Tom Clancy or John Grisham’s main characters”?
I certainly agree that those genes are critical when it comes to making more people, but the fact that women exist should tell you that an individual can live a long healthy life without them.
and this one
The company spent millions on systems and machines that theoretically might have worked. But didn't.
I know - choosing not to tip on "principle" is basically the same as me feeling like I'm making a difference by not donating money to anything. I mean, at least I'm not donating to the bad organizations right?! I'm so principled.
Maybe she has wondered that because she loves him and doesn't want to hurt him or take advantage of him?
This. Not to mention the fact that anthropologists and evolutionary psychologists aren't necessarily all in sync with the "we evolved to be polyamorous" theory. There are a few different schools of thought that say a few different things.
It's very nice that you found an environment in which you are happy, but I do wish people would stop deferring to evolution every single time. The people who write books and push the idea that humans "evolved" or "didn't evolve" to be monogamous or play football or drive a Toyota Cressida do so with very flimsy…
It's not global warming- it's just all the hot air generated by Sarah Palin.
I agree with your entire theory and sadly that's why when I figure out a show is going to tell this kind of "story" I have to seriously consider whether I want to continue to watch or not. Usually the answer is no.