My point is that they wrote a stereotypical "Stan Lee is a monster for taking more credit than the artist, even though he gave them more credit than any writer/publisher previously had," article…and now they're we have one whose thrust is "it doesn't matter how many women are involved in the creative process, because…

…he absolutely deserves a ton of credit for being the first writer/publisher to ever list his artists as co-creators.

The review literally complains about Lee taking credit for being the the first writer to list the artist as a co-creator…without refuting the claim.

Kate Kane isn't one!

In fairness, he said "whisky," not "whiskey."

Titus trying to assassinate Clarke was absolutely a direct consequences of the choices Lexa made.

I'm ignoring those points because the logical consequences of a character's choices should always fundamentally trump the any circumstances outside the story.

…huh?

And Montoya proceeded to be fucking awesome in the role.

A) Your very referring to them as "interchangeable white men" speaks to the fact that they would not have been equally tragic.

The Magicians actually gets quite good toward the end of S1.

I think it was absolutely intentional…on the part of the character, who is almost certainly secretly evil!

Maybe she's trying to imitate Efron's turn in Neighbors.

Eh, Cheney makes more sense.

"Who gives two fucks what a random factory worker in Wisconsin thinks about a nazi getting punched?"

I don't think nonviolence is necessarily morally superior.

It doesn't "undo the normalization," because, by punching him, they ceded control of the conversation, and opened the door for false moral equivalencies from a media that strives for neutrality rather than objectivity.

Who gives a shit about memes, YouTube hits or jokes?

…who cares what Nazis understand? Punching them in the face is no more effective in convincing them of their shittiness than debating them.

Fair enough.