which was something that so, so, worried you
TL;DR *shrug*
tldrshrug
Yes, but not a divorced former stay at home dad without money and probably lesser career opportunities.
Society does not see her as lazy and complacent for receiving alimony, other than men who still are supposed to be self-reliant. Do you seriously deny that double standard?
Sounds like a great idea until he decides he wants to be with someone else, and then all the sacrifices you made to secure a lower-paying but flexible job just means making less money to support yourself without him.
Wait a second, somewhere from 2 -8 % of all rape accusations are believed to be false and that is known as ‘myth of false rape accusations’ but 3% dudes getting spousal support constitutes as ‘not a myth’. Hm, I guess it’s true, it’s lies, damn lies and statistics.
No, those 3% were most likely stay at home dads, also known as ‘damaged goods’ on the dating online market, considering that in most cases they have no money, no career and are seen as parasites by society for demanding alimony from their ex.
Hint - when you’re visiting a website that usually refers to a penis as ‘dick’ , don’t complain about ‘coochie’, mkay?
Yep, here’s your ‘myth’:
Agreed, let’s call alimony ‘husband price’. QED
In western societies, “bride price” is known as “alimony”.
In every *other* imaginable situation
It sounds like some new guy on the ref squad had to show who was in charge and make a big scene.
A slimy, creepy person who is breaking the law to convey explosive material about the private life of another person to a webiste which then concocts a sensationalistic story to bring said person down.
point of order - starting a rumor, any rumor about a woman’s lady parts will get you solidly into the filthy misogynistic pig column, defending a sleazy website’s right to post dick rumors will get you knighted as a ‘hero lawyer’.
“I assume that you do not have personal knowledge about the size of Leto’s penis” in letters to other lawyers.”
Why do you have access to the internet?
It’s not the outrage about a wardrobe malfunction, it’s the outrage about the media showing those wardrobe malfunctions of women in great detail and getting their knickers in a twist. That’s a bit hypocritical when you show Lenny’s wang from all angles (not that there is anything wrong with that).
*I* never compared the stolen nudies to the Kravitz penis show, andsmokeit did. You might wanna read again! I compare it to the reactions on GM about online publications showing various wardrobe malfunctions by female celebrities on stage, during award shows etc. You show Lenny’s little friend over an over again, you…
Sure, but that was a pre-planned wardrobe ‘malfunction’. Both artists were in cahoots about it and so was their management. Hard to criticize the media for showing the nipple on live tv.