Agreed, don't see any evidence that he didn't make the catch.
Agreed, don't see any evidence that he didn't make the catch.
But...he did catch the ball, at least it’s in his glove when he’s going down across the railing into the seats. That other ball fell out of the green bag there.
Unlikely as he clearly has the ball in the tip of his glove when he falling into the stands. There is no evidence that he dropped the baseball and then grabbed he ball that rolled THE OPPOSITE DIRECTION out of the bag and used it to try and fool the umpire. This is shitty journalism as best.
As always, you’re content to present a one-sided perspective and not the whole picture. Yes, the rule would have introduced some useful consumer protections, but why not point out that it would have cost investors an estimated $13 billion in additional fees? Or the fact that financial advisors would be required to pay…
Eh, while this is certainly newsworthy, of all the nasty things this Administration and Congress are doing, I don’t think this is one that’ll go down in the history books for our great-grandchildren to wonder if we’d truly lost our minds.
How I keep cords untangled.
I really thought the USB cable was going to require an old toilet paper tube.
CPCs are run by Christians generally. As a group, they tend to be quite generous with their own time and money. I know many churches specifically work to help young mothers.
Umm, Lena Dunham is for abortion as a first choice. She wishes she could have had one! Also, hate to bring it up but PP in the past has been for abortion as a first choice for certain groups of people.
If you would save and invest every paycheck like you should then you would be happy. Doesnt matter how much the top owns, get your own piece of the pie for yourself and watch it grow.
As the owner of a two S-Corps, both small businesses, this has a drastic effect on how owners of such corporations make decisions. There have been times where the choice was “hire more people or pay the tax”. Well, you don’t have an option - so you always pay the tax.
Since 95% of all US businesses qualify, this will…
Obviously this provision looks biased toward specific people in government, but how many of the “...sole proprietorships, partnerships, and S-corporations. About 95% of businesses in the U.S...” will also benefit from this provision? If they all do, then isn’t that really benefiting whose who are intended to benefit?…
This is just what we need: another website turned political. Is there anyplace on the internet left where we can escape it?
Absolutely there are. But this article is really mouthpiece about the movement to eliminate the current bail structure in favor of a risk-based release program for accused offenders, which leaves zero incentive for actual bad guys to fear retribution. Revolving door. One recent suspect out on bond killed an elderly…
Or, you know, don’t commit crimes.
The linked website (and even the article above) paint things in rather broad strokes, too. The website shows Red = Bad Laws and Blue = Good Laws. It tries to show any and all bills relating in any way to immigration, “reproductive rights” (think abortion, birth control, sex education, etc.), LGBT rights (again,…
California is not immune to passing stupid laws either. AB199 that is in consideration right now and is a terrible law that will increase new housing costs by nearly 50% while we are in a low income housing shortage.
California is also the state with the most amount of debt.
I think it’s pretty damn clear that few few people who objected to trump (including not a single goddamned writer at Gizmodo Media have) have learned anything at all from this fiasco.
How is enforcement of laws (illegal immigration) bad? Since we’re picking and choosing laws to enforce, I choose not to enforce speeding, tax evasion, and maybe movie piracy as I see fit. Thanks.
Biased. Plain and simple. Even legal immigrants don’t like this bashing of enforcement. And yes, your ancestors DID have to…