I'll bet she has a lot of interesting, well thought out things to say and we'll all benefit from giving her the attention she so desperately craves.

You got that right. After this I might just retire. May Kinja engulf us all.

I'll leave the last word to you:

That is some disingenous bullshit.

What's so utterly frustrating though is the way you ignore the entire crux of what I'm saying.

Because I didn't mention his character at all. I talked about his actions. You can choose to infer what his character is by his actions, but that's on you as I didn't so much as mention it and my argument is based specifically on the actions themselves.

Yeah, Trump has the best security and the best medical care and just look at how happy he is.

I read it. You keep saying "should, should, should". That's your opinion. It means nothing to me on its own. What I care about is whether, to paraphrase your good self, it would be noteworthy for HAS to use his platform to spout antisemitic/racist shit, as he did before Trump gave him the platform. We both agree that…

So is your argument, at its core, that it's wrong of CNN not to report his identity?

I'm not talking about character. I'm talking about his actions. You're completely twisting my argument.

And yes, it would, in fact be noteworthy if HAS used his newfound fame to continue spouting racist shit.

And yet it's you who cannot provide evidence for any of your claims.

Yes, I'm calling you what you are. Your defence of rapists is disgusting. Your denial of facts is ridiculous. Your insistence on lying and obfuscating is absurd. You're an apologist for a group which commits genocide and rape. You should be ashamed of yourself.

Therefore, it's impossible that any sexual slavery has occurred under ISIS, even though they acknowledge the practice themselves, and even though there is masses of evidence from victims and perpetrators that it takes place.

No, you're getting confused. What happened here was this:

Exactly. There's no evidence for your bullshit claim.

Where exactly have ISIS said that sex slaves have the right to refuse sex?

You can insist it's "CONSENSUAL" all you want. You're wrong. The Yazidi girls (to pick one example) didn't ask to be enslaved. They didn't ask to be bought for sex with strangers. They didn't ask to become sex slaves. They didn't ask to be raped. ISIS acknowledges that they practice sexual slavery. The fact that they…

Not to mention "money can't buy happiness".

You're quibbling over whether ISIS consider it rape. It doesn't matter if they do or don't. Sexual slavery is rape, whether you and ISIS agree or not.